2012
DOI: 10.1167/12.7.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of linear ego-acceleration from optic flow

Abstract: Human observers are able to estimate various ego-motion parameters from optic flow, including rotation, translational heading, time-to-collision (TTC), time-to-passage (TTP), etc. The perception of linear ego-acceleration or deceleration, i.e., changes of translational velocity, is less well understood. While time-to-passage experiments indicate that ego-acceleration is neglected, subjects are able to keep their (perceived) speed constant under changing conditions, indicating that some sense of ego-acceleratio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
12
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, participants anticipated on average the response during accelerated with respect to constant speed motions, and delayed it during decelerated motion. This behavior is in contrast with the predictions of the tau model (Tresilian 1999;1995) extended to time-to-passage tasks (Festl et al 2012;Capelli et al 2010;Kaiser and Hecht 1995;Lee 1980Lee , 1976, which assumes that second-order information (acceleration) is not used in predicting TTP. As a consequence, this classical model predicts that the duration of constant speed motions should be estimated correctly while it should be overestimated for accelerated and underestimated for decelerated motions.…”
Section: Kinematics Effectcontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, participants anticipated on average the response during accelerated with respect to constant speed motions, and delayed it during decelerated motion. This behavior is in contrast with the predictions of the tau model (Tresilian 1999;1995) extended to time-to-passage tasks (Festl et al 2012;Capelli et al 2010;Kaiser and Hecht 1995;Lee 1980Lee , 1976, which assumes that second-order information (acceleration) is not used in predicting TTP. As a consequence, this classical model predicts that the duration of constant speed motions should be estimated correctly while it should be overestimated for accelerated and underestimated for decelerated motions.…”
Section: Kinematics Effectcontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Most studies indicate that human and non-human primates can visually detect accelerations, but the discrimination of acceleration is much poorer than that of speed (Orban 2008;Brouwer et al 2002;Werkhoven et al 1992;Snowden and Braddick 1991;Calderone and Kaiser 1989;De Bruyn and Orban 1988). In some self-motion studies, TTP estimation did not seem to take into account the deceleration signal, while the use of acceleration signal appeared to depend on stimuli parameters (Festl et al 2012;Capelli et al 2010;Kaiser and Hecht 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, TTP estimates for self-motion are based on first-order optic flow and do not make use of retinal acceleration (Festl et al 2012). However, the acceleration due to gravity appears to be taken into account during visually simulated self-motion in the vertical direction: Observers trigger the motor response for passage at a landmark earlier during downward than forward motion, consistent with the a priori that downward but not forward motion is accelerated by gravity (Indovina et al 2013a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Ego-acceleration is an important variable in the control of movement because it can be used to stabilize egomotion by a simple feedback loop. Ego-acceleration can be perceived from optic flow but suffers from a perceptual confusion similar to the depth-velocity ambiguity, which may be called a narrowing-acceleration confusion (Festl, Recktenwald, Yuan, & Mallot, 2012): Subjects confuse the narrowing of a tunnel with ego-acceleration and the widening of a tunnel with egodeceleration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%