1977
DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1977.10489493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Influential Observation in Linear Regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
588
0
13

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,094 publications
(689 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
588
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The variables did not exceed the cutoffs for skewness, kurtosis, and outliers identified by West, Finch, and Curran (1995). According to Cook's (1977) distance, there were no multivariate outliers.…”
Section: Tests Of Mediationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The variables did not exceed the cutoffs for skewness, kurtosis, and outliers identified by West, Finch, and Curran (1995). According to Cook's (1977) distance, there were no multivariate outliers.…”
Section: Tests Of Mediationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Of course, both traits are estimates and are not 349 known without error and there is debate surrounding the taxonomic classification of some named 350 species, and their relationships to one another. The analyses should therefore not be viewed as Leverage was measured using Cook's Distance (D i ) (Cook, 1977), which quantifies the effect on 365 a regression of deleting an observation. D i values greater than 4 / n indicate a data point has high 366 leverage (Bollen and Jackman, 1990).…”
Section: Intraspecific Scaling Components 261mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data was then screened for multivariate outliers using both the Mahalanobis D and Cook's D statistics. The criterion for identifying outliers with the Mahalanobis D statistic was p \ .001 (Kline 2016) and for the Cook's D statistic it was any instance greater than 1 (Cook 1977). While no cases were identified as multivariate outliers under the Cook's D criterion, seven cases (3.29% of the dataset) were identified as outliers under the Mahalanobis D statistic.…”
Section: Data Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%