2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000115926.96796.75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Individual Microbubbles of Ultrasound Contrast Agents

Abstract: Ultrasound medical systems can resolve backscatter signals from individual microbubbles of ultrasound contrast, both in solution and in the targeted immobilized state, implying picogram sensitivity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
121
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(22 reference statements)
2
121
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum response (e f % 35%, e 2f % 11%) can be found for microbubbles with a radius of $3.4 lm, which is a typical resonant size for a driving frequency of 1 MHz, as reported previously. 23,27 The experimental data showed good agreement with the simulation results. Figures 3(c) and 3(d) illustrates the asymmetric vibrational response, indicated by the difference between the relative amplitude of the expansion and the compression phase (A exp À A com ), versus bubble size R meas .…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The maximum response (e f % 35%, e 2f % 11%) can be found for microbubbles with a radius of $3.4 lm, which is a typical resonant size for a driving frequency of 1 MHz, as reported previously. 23,27 The experimental data showed good agreement with the simulation results. Figures 3(c) and 3(d) illustrates the asymmetric vibrational response, indicated by the difference between the relative amplitude of the expansion and the compression phase (A exp À A com ), versus bubble size R meas .…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…23 The vibrational response (radius-time curve) of a total of 72 single microbubbles to a 1 MHz ultrasound burst with a peak negative pressure of 50 kPa was measured and analyzed. The measured resting radius (R meas ) of each microbubble was estimated from a selected in-focus image from an optical recording using an edge-tracking minimum cost algorithm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Although a single unit of contrast is on the order of 0.25 to 1 µm in diameter, the generated acoustic perturbation appears much larger" . Therefore, theoretically ultrasound-based techniques have the potential to detect a single cell loaded with a single unit of contrast Klibanov, Rasche et al 2004). However, techniques to intracellular ultrasound contrast labeling are not yet robust, and more importantly, their possible effects on cell function are not yet identified.…”
Section: Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Echocardiography therefore has the potential to detect a single cell loaded with a single unit of contrast. 17 Nevertheless, methods to accumulate contrast intracellularly are not yet robust, and effects on cell motility, etc, are not known. An additional problem is that echogenic contrast agents cast an acoustic "shadow" below the first unit of contrast detected, thus precluding accurate quantification of cell number.…”
Section: Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%