2019
DOI: 10.33263/briac95.433438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of imidacloprid and Bisphenol-S by Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) coupled with UV-VIS spectrometer and LC-MS

Abstract: Solid-phase extraction (SPE) and UV/Vis-spectrometer are acknowledged as economical and efficient technique analytical techniques and applied in analyzing target organic compounds in water and other aqueous samples. The present study suggested imidacloprid (at 270nm) and bisphenol-S (at 259nm) can be detected and quantitatively measured via UV-vis spectrometer. The assay was linear with a good coefficient of correlation for both imidacloprid (R2= 0.9992) and bisphenol-S (R2 = 0.9996). Based on SPE coupled with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In foodstuffs, a sample preparation step is needed to eliminate or reduce the matrix effects. Among these methods, it is worth mentioning different approaches for the extraction of neonicotinoid insecticides: liquid-liquid extraction [ 27 ], liquid-phase microextraction [ 28 ], dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction [ 29 ], solid-phase extraction [ 30 ], and magnetic solid-phase extraction [ 31 ]. However, these methods present one or more of the following disadvantages: large organic solvent consumption, low adsorption capacity of the sorbent, high cost, or low recoveries [ 32 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In foodstuffs, a sample preparation step is needed to eliminate or reduce the matrix effects. Among these methods, it is worth mentioning different approaches for the extraction of neonicotinoid insecticides: liquid-liquid extraction [ 27 ], liquid-phase microextraction [ 28 ], dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction [ 29 ], solid-phase extraction [ 30 ], and magnetic solid-phase extraction [ 31 ]. However, these methods present one or more of the following disadvantages: large organic solvent consumption, low adsorption capacity of the sorbent, high cost, or low recoveries [ 32 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In foodstufs, a sample preparation step is needed to eliminate or reduce the matrix efects. Among these methods, it is worth mentioning diferent approaches for the extraction of neonicotinoid insecticides: liquid-liquid extraction [27], liquid-phase microextraction [28], dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction [29], solidphase extraction [30], and magnetic solid-phase extraction [31]. However, these methods present one or more of the following disadvantages: large organic solvent consumption, low adsorption capacity of the sorbent, high cost, or low recoveries [32].…”
Section: Sample Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous reports are available for the micro-level determination of sulfur-containing drugs and molecules in biological samples and pharmaceutical preparations [20][21][22][23]. The determination methods includes potentiometry [24], NMR-spectrometry [25], colorimetry [20], chromatography [26][27][28], flow injection analysis [29], fluorimetry [30], voltammetry [31] and spectrophotometry [32,33]. The high initial investment, timeconsuming processes, high costs of sample analysis, and heavy instrumentation are major concerns of many reported methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%