2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of illegal mine voids using electrical resistivity tomography: The case-study of Raniganj coalfield (India)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the resistivity signatures identi ed by the joint inversion of all arrays is mainly the combination of the signatures/features of each array. These consequences are in accordance with the earlier observations that shows the effectiveness of the combined inversion of collective data sets (Vega et al, 2003;Athanasiou et al, 2007;Bharti et al, 2016aBharti et al, , 2016b. It is observed that the joint data (Wenner, Schlumberger, Gradient and Dipole-Dipole) carry supplementary evidence compared to a single array data set (Stummer et al 2004;Athanasiou et al 2007) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the resistivity signatures identi ed by the joint inversion of all arrays is mainly the combination of the signatures/features of each array. These consequences are in accordance with the earlier observations that shows the effectiveness of the combined inversion of collective data sets (Vega et al, 2003;Athanasiou et al, 2007;Bharti et al, 2016aBharti et al, , 2016b. It is observed that the joint data (Wenner, Schlumberger, Gradient and Dipole-Dipole) carry supplementary evidence compared to a single array data set (Stummer et al 2004;Athanasiou et al 2007) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…They argued that the best result is obtained with minimum RMS error, with quality factor 5% and current threshold of 60mA. Further, Bharti et al (2016b) analyzed ERT data collected for cavity detection using a xed quality factor 5% with variable current thresholds (50mA, 100mA and 150mA). This study reveals that the best result is obtained with a minimum RMS error when the current threshold is 150 mA followed by100mA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resistivity data was collected using Shlumberger protocol (n=2) with inner and outer electrode spacing 5 m and 10 m respectively. The Shlumberger array configuration was employed for data acquisition, because of good compromise for both vertical and horizontal structural resolutions (Bharti et al, 2016;Cardimona, 2002;Samouëlian et al, 2005;Tejero et al, 2017;Zhou & Dahlin, 2003).…”
Section: Methodology 2d Electrical Resistivity Imaging Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, 2D ERT is simple, rapid, inexpensive and a viable technique for subsurface geological features identifications (e.g. Beresnev et al, 2002;Bharti et al, 2016;Chambers J. et al, 2013;Chambers J.E. et al, 2006;Dahlin & Zhou, 2004;Longo et al, 2014;Meju, 2002;Mojica et al, 2017;Rucker et al, 2012;Van Schoor, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is suitable for estimating depth of the bedrock and identifying the presence of structural features in the bedrock or potentially hazardous sub-surface conditions before the engineering structure is put in place [10]. The electrical resistivity method had found landmark success in solving a wide variety of engineering and environmental problems [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Application of 2D electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) in geo-technical investigations of the foundation at Ogudu Lagos, Nigeria [20], showed that the depth to the competent layer that could support a sizeable engineering structure is confined to the second half of the surveyed northeast area at a deeper depth mapped by ERT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%