such applications due to their straightforward synthesis, optical properties, and the diverse array of surface chemistry modifications that can be used to functionalize them with factors that recognize specific biomolecules and thereby generate probes that can detect and quantify specific targets of interest. [2] Such NP probes are typically highly stable, the signal they produce is durable, and can be more intense than that produced by fluorescent dyes or quantum dots, yet can be read by inexpensive dark field microscopes available in most research and clinical laboratories. [3] Scattering signal corresponds to NP size, although the inverse relationship between NP signal and NP binding kinetics, can constrain the size range of NPs used in nanoprobe applications and their limits of detection. Alternate detection approaches that employ enzymatic reactions to enhance signal intensity (e.g., an electrochemical-chemical-enzymatic redox cycling reaction read by an electrochemical sensor [4] and conversion of enzyme substrate to an insoluble form read by a simple surface plasmonic resonance sensor [5] ) can be more sensitive but may need to be read in real-time, require sophisticated equipment and highly trained personnel, or depend upon close temperature control during transport, storage, and assay performance.The signal produced by NP probes are a function of their composition, geometry, and size but can be modified in situ by increasing the apparent size or surface composition of affinity bound NPs through specific NP growth, modification, or aggregation methods. Multiple methods have been developed to enhance biosensing characteristics of localized surface plasmonic resonance (LSPR) probes, but most of these involve tradeoffs between signal enhancement efficiency, target specificity, and assay complexity. For example, NPs with complex (e.g., nanostars) or hybrid compositions (e.g., gold/silica structures) can exhibit enhanced light scattering characteristics, but these material can be difficult to synthesis and manipulate, [6] and increasing NP size to improve scattering can negatively affect their binding kinetics. [7] However, chemical reactions employed to induce in situ NP growth or surface modifications after their binding to a biomarker target can disrupt probetarget interactions to produce signal loss or allow nonspecific deposition of NP material on other matrixes present the Sensitive detection of extracellular vesicles (EVs) as emerging biomarkers has shown great promises for disease diagnosis. Plasmonic metal nanostructures conjugated with molecules that bind specific biomarker targets are widely used for EVs sensing but involve tradeoffs between particle-sizedependent signal intensity and conjugation efficiency. One solution to this problem would be to induce nucleation on nanoparticles that have successfully bound a target biomarker to permit in situ nanoparticle growth for signal amplification, but approaches that are evaluated to date require harsh conditions or lack nucleation specificity, prohibi...