2000
DOI: 10.1128/cdli.7.1.86-90.2000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Francisella tularensis in Biological Specimens Using a Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, an Immunochromatographic Handheld Assay, and a PCR

Abstract: The early detection of Francisella tularensis, the causative agent of tularemia, is important for adequate treatment by antibiotics and the outcome of the disease. Here we describe a new capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) based on monoclonal antibodies specific for lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica and Francisella tularensis subsp. tularensis. No cross-reactivity with Francisella tularensis subsp. novicida, Francisella philomiragia, and a panel of other possib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
96
0
19

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
96
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the cutoff value in the cELISA for animal specimens was set as 40%, thus cross-reaction of antibodies to F. novicida was negligible. This might be supported by the previous report that showed no cross-reaction between F. tularensis and F. novicida (Grunow et al 2000). Antibodies detected in the wild animals by the cELISA are therefore considered to be specific to F. tularensis LPS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In the present study, the cutoff value in the cELISA for animal specimens was set as 40%, thus cross-reaction of antibodies to F. novicida was negligible. This might be supported by the previous report that showed no cross-reaction between F. tularensis and F. novicida (Grunow et al 2000). Antibodies detected in the wild animals by the cELISA are therefore considered to be specific to F. tularensis LPS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Although this method is not as sensitive for the detection of F. tularensis bacteria in blood as it is for the detection of bacteria in PBS solution, the detection limit is still comparable to most ELISA methods [24,53]. However, our technology has the advantage of greater safety because we are detecting bacterial peptides after the bacteria have been inactivated by lysis and proteolysis.…”
Section: Detection Of F Tularensis Bacteria In Blood-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The singly-charged, epitope-containing tryptic peptide (aa 49-61 NIVAIEGGEDVTK) from the IglC protein was observed at m/z = 1344.7 ( Figure 4). Therefore the detection limit for bacteria in PBS solution is determined to be 8 CFU bacteria on target by using 50% of the antibody beads incubated with 50μL of a bacterial solution in PBS, at a concentration of 320 CFU mL -1 , which is as low as the most sensitive detection systems yet developed [51,52]. It should be noted that 8 CFU does not represent the lowest possible detection limit in real applications, but is an estimate of the lowest possible detection limit of our method, as the tryptic digestion of the protein equivalent of 8 CFU might be difficult.…”
Section: Detection Of F Tularensis Bacteria In Pbs Solution-by Direcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One product is a handheld immunochromatographic assay that has a limit of detection of 10 6 -10 7 bacteria/ml in human serum [60]. Further research will hopefully yield diagnostic products with both speed and accuracy.…”
Section: Other Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%