2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2004.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of hypothetical proteins in 10 individual human tumor cell lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be delineated by the higher number of polyphenol compounds present in both the aqueous (9 out of 10 polyphenols) and methanolic (3 out of 4 polyphenols) P. urinaria extracts [17,20], hence having a higher capability to cause antimetastatic activities on A549. Some of those proteins were represented by more than one spot, which represents different splicing forms of the same protein as a result of post-translational modification [14]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This could be delineated by the higher number of polyphenol compounds present in both the aqueous (9 out of 10 polyphenols) and methanolic (3 out of 4 polyphenols) P. urinaria extracts [17,20], hence having a higher capability to cause antimetastatic activities on A549. Some of those proteins were represented by more than one spot, which represents different splicing forms of the same protein as a result of post-translational modification [14]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to other malignant pathologies, tumor markers for NSCLC remained inadequate. Serum biomarkers employed in the current clinical setting such as ENO (enolase alpha), CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen), SCC (squamous cell carcinoma), CA-125 (cancer antigen 125) or TPA (tissue polypeptide antigen) are not satisfactory due to their low sensitivity and specificity [13,14]. In the quest for novel diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers, the proteomic technique is ideal since it permits qualitative and quantitative analysis of numerous proteins simultaneously [9,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most commonly used comparative proteomic approach is two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS), which provides a good proteomic tool for the investigation of novel proteins that might serve as candidates for tumor markers. Previously, 2D-PAGE analyses of protein changes were performed to study chemoresistance, 22 to search for markers for tumor diagnosis in NB cell lines, 23,24 and to study quantitatively and qualitatively differences in healthy and pathological NB mouse samples. 25,26 Moreover, proteomic characterization of differentiation induced by ATRA has been described in promyelocytic cells 7,27,28 and in mouse embryonic stem cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search for markers and vaccines at the protein level is more reliable than at the transcriptional level, as the translation process is often unpredictable and the spatiotemporal in situ localization of a given protein is not often correlated with its in situ expression pattern [8] . Although several genomic studies have been performed using pediatric OS primary tumor tissues or cells [9,10] , comparative proteomic studies on OS are rare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%