Detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) DNA and RNA sequences in HIV-1 antibody-positive blood donors in Uganda by the Roche AMPLICOR assay
Abstract:The ability of commercially available PCR-based assays to accurately detect or quantitate human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) DNA or RNA in individuals predominantly infected with HIV-1 subtypes A and D is not known. Therefore, peripheral leukocytes from 43 individuals in Kampala, Uganda, positive for HIV by the Western blot (immunoblot) assay were tested by using the Roche AMPLICOR HIV-1 assay for the detection of DNA gag sequences. Plasma from these same individuals was tested by using the Roche HIV-… Show more
“…It was reported that a decrease in amplification efficiency occurs with five to six mutations in the primerbinding region (10,24), and this amount of divergence occurs most frequently with subtypes A and E. Similar results were reported when samples from Uganda, where subtypes A and D predominate, were tested with the Amplicor HIV-1 DNA test; the sensitivity for the samples from Uganda was 74% (22). Replacement of the primer-probe set selected from the gag gene with a primer-probe set from the better conserved pol gene increased the sensitivity of the DNA detection assay to 98% (22). Similarly, Respess et al (35) reported 100% sensitivity for detection of subtypes A and E with pol-based primers but only 87 and 67% sensitivities, respectively, when gag-based primers were used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In the multiplex HIV-1/2 qualitative RNA assay described here, these difficulties were overcome by the meticulous choice of primers and cycling conditions, without compromising sensitivity for HIV-1 detection. The multiplex assay for HIV-1 and HIV-2 detection has a sensitivity of 20 to 50 copies per ml for HIV-1, which is similar to the sensitivities of ultrasensitive versions of assays that detect only HIV-1 (22,30,37). Sensitivity is also critical for detection of HIV-2, especially since lower HIV-2 RNA levels in plasma have been demonstrated (29,41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…All the nucleic acid detection assays developed so far have been based primarily on subtype B strains from North America and Europe. The sensitivities of these tests for detection of divergent strains were evaluated in several studies (3,14,22,35,44). Evaluation of the HIV-Monitor, version 1.0, and the nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) assays revealed that 56 and 44% of subtype A-containing samples tested were negative by these assays, respectively (3).…”
Early detection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in blood and blood products can be achieved by a sensitive nucleic acid amplification-based assay. We report on the performance of a PCR-based qualitative assay that detects both HIV type 1 (HIV-1) and HIV-2 with a sensitivity of 20 to 50 copies/ml. The assay has a specificity of 99.6% and an inhibition rate of 1.7%. One milliliter of sample is processed with a manifold system and Qiagen columns, and one-third of the extracted sample is used for PCR amplification. An internal control sequence, which is processed and amplified with each sample, monitors for amplification inhibition. Samples are reverse transcribed and are then amplified by reverse transcription-coupled PCR, after which HIV-1- and HIV-2-specific probes are hybridized to the amplified products. Following hybridization, samples are detected in the LCx instrument by microparticle enzyme immunoassay techniques. The detection system has an automated inactivation step that controls for PCR contamination. The HIV-1/2 qualitative RNA assay detects HIV-1 group M subtypes A, B, C, D, E, F, and G and group O. Testing of several HIV-1 seroconversion panels has demonstrated that the HIV-1/2 qualitative RNA assay detects HIV infection on the average of 6 days before p24 antigen can be detected and 11 days before antibodies can be detected.
“…It was reported that a decrease in amplification efficiency occurs with five to six mutations in the primerbinding region (10,24), and this amount of divergence occurs most frequently with subtypes A and E. Similar results were reported when samples from Uganda, where subtypes A and D predominate, were tested with the Amplicor HIV-1 DNA test; the sensitivity for the samples from Uganda was 74% (22). Replacement of the primer-probe set selected from the gag gene with a primer-probe set from the better conserved pol gene increased the sensitivity of the DNA detection assay to 98% (22). Similarly, Respess et al (35) reported 100% sensitivity for detection of subtypes A and E with pol-based primers but only 87 and 67% sensitivities, respectively, when gag-based primers were used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In the multiplex HIV-1/2 qualitative RNA assay described here, these difficulties were overcome by the meticulous choice of primers and cycling conditions, without compromising sensitivity for HIV-1 detection. The multiplex assay for HIV-1 and HIV-2 detection has a sensitivity of 20 to 50 copies per ml for HIV-1, which is similar to the sensitivities of ultrasensitive versions of assays that detect only HIV-1 (22,30,37). Sensitivity is also critical for detection of HIV-2, especially since lower HIV-2 RNA levels in plasma have been demonstrated (29,41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…All the nucleic acid detection assays developed so far have been based primarily on subtype B strains from North America and Europe. The sensitivities of these tests for detection of divergent strains were evaluated in several studies (3,14,22,35,44). Evaluation of the HIV-Monitor, version 1.0, and the nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) assays revealed that 56 and 44% of subtype A-containing samples tested were negative by these assays, respectively (3).…”
Early detection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in blood and blood products can be achieved by a sensitive nucleic acid amplification-based assay. We report on the performance of a PCR-based qualitative assay that detects both HIV type 1 (HIV-1) and HIV-2 with a sensitivity of 20 to 50 copies/ml. The assay has a specificity of 99.6% and an inhibition rate of 1.7%. One milliliter of sample is processed with a manifold system and Qiagen columns, and one-third of the extracted sample is used for PCR amplification. An internal control sequence, which is processed and amplified with each sample, monitors for amplification inhibition. Samples are reverse transcribed and are then amplified by reverse transcription-coupled PCR, after which HIV-1- and HIV-2-specific probes are hybridized to the amplified products. Following hybridization, samples are detected in the LCx instrument by microparticle enzyme immunoassay techniques. The detection system has an automated inactivation step that controls for PCR contamination. The HIV-1/2 qualitative RNA assay detects HIV-1 group M subtypes A, B, C, D, E, F, and G and group O. Testing of several HIV-1 seroconversion panels has demonstrated that the HIV-1/2 qualitative RNA assay detects HIV infection on the average of 6 days before p24 antigen can be detected and 11 days before antibodies can be detected.
“…The πCode assay platform is based on the IntelliPlex1000 πCode Processor, an automated hybridizing and washing machine, and the PlexBio100 Analyzer for the fluorescent signal detection of the πCode MicroDiscs. Despite the high detection sensitivity achieved with the sk145 and skcc1b primer set, further optimization can accomplish a much higher sensitive HIV-1 DNA assay using different sets of primers, considering the limitation of the sk145 and skcc1b primer set to detect non-B clade HIV-1 subtypes [45,[78][79][80]. In future studies, we will use a different primer set that can potentially achieve a successful detection of all HIV-1 subtypes plus maximum sensitivity for HIV-1 DNA detection.…”
Peripheral blood samples from patients diagnosed as HIV-1 positive and treated with anti-retroviral therapy (ART) for prolonged periods of time can present difficulties in current quantitative HIV-1 DNA detection, based on PCR assays. The current gold standard platform for HIV-1 DNA detection is real-time PCR, but its sensitivity is not always enough to detect extremely low levels of HIV-1 DNA in some patients. We have developed a novel end-point PCR assay based on precision image pi-code (πCode) MicroDiscs detection platform. The newly developed "πCode assay" showed 100% sensitivity, while the real-time PCR assay showed 92.3%, in a head-to-head comparison using blood samples from 39 HIV-1 infected clinic patients, with a stable fully suppressed plasma viral-load (<20 copies/mL) for more than 2 years. Further analysis revealed a detection sensitivity over 27 times higher for the "πCode assay" compared to real-time PCR. The πCode assay is very specific and reproducible, with less than 20% Coefficient of Variation (CV) in detection, ranging from 40 to 4000 HIV-1 DNA copies per one million white blood cells. The πCode assay may have a great potential to be a standard assay platform in the future for the HIV diagnostic field, focusing on HIV cure trials.
“…In a study evaluating a limited number of RNA transcripts representing sev-eral different clades, the Chiron bDNA assay appeared to quantify the subtypes similarly (22). Modification of the procedures and/or the primers of other assays may improve detection of different clades of HIV-1 by these assays (20). A comprehensive set of reagents representing the various clades will be needed to provide standards for appropriate comparability studies with kits from various manufacturers.…”
Section: Effect Of Assay and Biologic Variation On Detectionmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.