2012
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eus339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of high incidence of Riata lead breaches by systematic postero-anterior and lateral chest X-ray in a large cohort

Abstract: The incidence of insulation breach in Riata leads is much higher than quoted by the manufacturer or reported by most of the literature. A PA and lateral CXR with zooming appears adequate to identify lead breaches when reviewed by an electrophysiologist. Riata lead breaches without electrical abnormalities present a management dilemma and will require further studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
3
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
24
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even the change in capture threshold compared to implant values was significant (p = 0.009). Similar finding was observed in the study by Steinberg et al [13] where abnormal leads had higher pacing threshold (1.1 ± 0.8 vs. 0.9 ± 0.4 V, p = 0.02). We did not find any significant differences with other electrical parameters among the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even the change in capture threshold compared to implant values was significant (p = 0.009). Similar finding was observed in the study by Steinberg et al [13] where abnormal leads had higher pacing threshold (1.1 ± 0.8 vs. 0.9 ± 0.4 V, p = 0.02). We did not find any significant differences with other electrical parameters among the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These studies were limited by the way insulation defects were ascertained and no systematic fluoroscopy was used. Cine fluoroscopy with higher resolution capabilities is certainly more sensitive in detecting insulation breach compared to two view chest X-ray where the prevalence of lead externalization has been reported of the order of 11.5% to 24.3% [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prevalence of CE ranged from 11% to 43% ( Figure 2A). 6,[10][11][12][13][15][16][17][19][20][21][22]25 Based on random effects modeling, the overall rate of CE was 23.1% (95% CI 19.0%-27.6%). In most but not all of these 13 studies, an average lead dwell time was reported (range 3.5-6.2 years).…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][26][27][28] Based on random effects modeling, the overall rate of EF was 6.3% (95% CI 4.7%-8.2%). Significant heterogeneity was again observed with I 2 = 89.507.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The rate of conductor externalization has been found to occur in up to 25% of these leads and has been observed to occur more commonly in the 8-F Riata lead. 3,4 Electrical lead failure is far less common and does not always occur in the presence of cable externalization. 5,6 We have previously reported on electrical lead failure and have found a rate of 4.6% over a 5-year follow-up, but cable externalization was present only in 8% of leads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%