Abstract:Purpose
To assess the performance of a four-kallikrein panel, with and without microseminoprotein-beta (MSP), to predict high-grade (Gleason 7+, Gleason Grade Group 2+) prostate cancer (PCa) on biopsy in a multiethnic cohort from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial.
Materials and Methods
Levels of free, intact, total prostate-specific antigen (PSA), human kallikrein-2, and MSP were measured blinded to outcome in cryo-preserved serum from men in the intervention arm of PL… Show more
“…Cryopreserved sample aliquots (serum or plasma) were shipped to the Wallenberg Research Laboratories at Lund University (Malmö, Sweden) for assay of the four kallikrein markers and MSP during 2014-2015. The analyses for total and free PSA [18], intact PSA [19], hK2 [20], and MSP [21] were previously reported [22,23]. [26].…”
Four kallikrein markers and β-microseminoprotein in blood improve discrimination of high-grade prostate cancer at biopsy in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen.
“…Cryopreserved sample aliquots (serum or plasma) were shipped to the Wallenberg Research Laboratories at Lund University (Malmö, Sweden) for assay of the four kallikrein markers and MSP during 2014-2015. The analyses for total and free PSA [18], intact PSA [19], hK2 [20], and MSP [21] were previously reported [22,23]. [26].…”
Four kallikrein markers and β-microseminoprotein in blood improve discrimination of high-grade prostate cancer at biopsy in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen.
“…Using a cut-off of 6% risk of high-grade disease to determine biopsy kept the detection of high-grade disease by 88% and reduced unnecessary biopsies by 42%. [26]…”
Section: Determining the Need For Prostate Biopsymentioning
Purpose of review
To provide an overview of the current state of the evidence and highlight recent advances in the evaluation and diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer, focusing on biomarkers, risk calculators and mpMRI.
Recent findings
In 2017, there are numerous options to improve early detection as compared to a purely PSA-based approach. All have strengths and drawbacks. In addition to repeating the PSA and performing clinical work-up (DRE and estimation of prostate volume), additional tests investigated in the initial biopsy setting are: %free PSA, PHI, 4Kscore, SelectMDx and MiPS and in the repeat setting: %free PSA, PHI, 4Kscore, PCA3, and ConfirmMDx. Risk calculators are available for both biopsy settings and incorporate clinical data with, or without, biomarkers. mpMRI is an important diagnostic adjunct.
Summary
There are numerous tests available that can help increase the specificity of PSA, in the initial and repeat biopsy setting. All coincide with a small decrease in sensitivity of detecting high-grade cancer. Cost effectiveness is crucial. The way forward is a multivariable risk assessment on the basis of readily available clinical data, potentially with the addition of PSA subforms, preferably at low cost. MRI in the pre-diagnostic setting is promising, but is not ready for “prime time”.
“…Only data from completely independent validation studies were included, involving 8396 biopsies from eight cohorts. The PLCO study [4] was excluded because of the unusual sampling design; the Rotterdam Repeat Biopsy [5] cohort had an insufficient number of events. The base model consisted of age, total PSA, and digital rectal examination (DRE) result, if available.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.