1991
DOI: 10.1016/0883-2897(91)90008-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma using indium-111 (111In) labeled monoclonal antibody (mAB): MSKCC experience with mAb 111In-C110

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the EOTUBE-bsMAb complexes were held together monovalently, they would readily dissociate, providing a “slow-release” of EOTUBE, which would then be removed rapidly. While the pretargeting procedure was more complex than injecting a directly radiolabeled antibody, this method showed metastatic lesions in the liver with good contrast from surrounding normal liver, while 111 In-labeled anti-CEA IgG being used at the time often showed tumors as “cold” lesions due to higher uptake in normal liver 57,58…”
Section: Why Pretargeting?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the EOTUBE-bsMAb complexes were held together monovalently, they would readily dissociate, providing a “slow-release” of EOTUBE, which would then be removed rapidly. While the pretargeting procedure was more complex than injecting a directly radiolabeled antibody, this method showed metastatic lesions in the liver with good contrast from surrounding normal liver, while 111 In-labeled anti-CEA IgG being used at the time often showed tumors as “cold” lesions due to higher uptake in normal liver 57,58…”
Section: Why Pretargeting?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we prefer to use anti‐CEA mAbs whenever possible to evaluate patients with liver metastases. This is supported by two recent articles, by Haseman et al42 and Divgi et al,43 whereby In‐111 anti‐CEA mAbs (ZCE 025 or C110) correctly identified hepatic metastasis as “hot” spots in 44% and 81% of patients, respectively. In 173 patients with occult CEA‐producing cancer, mAb imaging accurately predicted the presence of disease in 91% of patients, and its absence in 84% of patients compared to CT scanning, and thus appears to be the best diagnostic imaging procedure currently available in this clinical setting 44…”
Section: Radiolabeled Monoclonal Antibodiesmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Four days later, the patient received 111 In-EOTUBE. This clinical investigation reported a detection sensitivity of 95% for known tumor lesions, some detected within 4 h of the 111 In-EOTUBE injection, including hepatic metastases, a site where other clinical studies using an intact 111 In-anti-CEA IgG frequently had difficulty because of the high background activity in the liver 36, 37.…”
Section: The Pretargeting Alternativementioning
confidence: 84%