2016
DOI: 10.2460/javma.249.2.189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of heart rate and rhythm with a smartphone-based electrocardiograph versus a reference standard electrocardiograph in dogs and cats

Abstract: OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic utility of ECGs acquired with a smartphone-based device, compared with reference 6-lead ECGs, for identification of heart rate and rhythm in dogs and cats. DESIGN Prospective study. ANIMALS 51 client-owned dogs and 27 client-owned cats. PROCEDURES Patients examined by a small animal referral cardiology service between April 2012 and January 2013 were enrolled consecutively. In each patient, a 30-second ECG was simultaneously acquired with a smartphone-based device (a bipola… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
47
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
6
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, both bradycardia and tachycardia in otherwise normal cattle should not be taken as a sign of heart disease unless it is persistent or associated with signs of cardiac failure . The smartphone ECG showed perfect agreement with the standard method when HR was measured manually on digitized tracings in cows, in accordance with findings in dogs and in horses where there is an excellent agreement between the 2 methods . The accuracy of App HR was good in comparison to HR measured manually on digitized tracings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, both bradycardia and tachycardia in otherwise normal cattle should not be taken as a sign of heart disease unless it is persistent or associated with signs of cardiac failure . The smartphone ECG showed perfect agreement with the standard method when HR was measured manually on digitized tracings in cows, in accordance with findings in dogs and in horses where there is an excellent agreement between the 2 methods . The accuracy of App HR was good in comparison to HR measured manually on digitized tracings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The accuracy of smartphone ECG tracings in measuring heart rate (HR), evaluating heart rhythm, and detecting ECG changes associated with myocardial ischemia is acceptable . Similarly, in dogs, cats, and horses, smartphone ECG provided adequate tracings for the assessment of HR and cardiac rhythm …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heart rates and EKGs were monitored using the AliveCor iPhone 4 s phone case and iPhone app (AliveCor, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA) as validated for cats and dogs ( 28 ). Heart rates were recorded every 30 min with the AliveCor device.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AliveCor is smartphone-based handheld ECG that delivered readable and interpretable data without the necessity of a cumbersome machine and electrode clips. AliveCor has been validated for rhythm evaluation in humans, dogs, cats, and water buffalo calves [ 25 28 ]. Measurement of QT and QTc in using the AliveCor device has reported to have good agreement with 12-lead ECG in humans [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%