2015
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/36/8/1679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of heart beats in multimodal data: a robust beat-to-beat interval estimation approach

Abstract: The heart rate and its variability play a vital role in the continuous monitoring of patients, especially in the critical care unit. They are commonly derived automatically from the electrocardiogram as the interval between consecutive heart beat. While their identification by QRS-complexes is straightforward under ideal conditions, the exact localization can be a challenging task if the signal is severely contaminated with noise and artifacts. At the same time, other signals directly related to cardiac activi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although originally developed for cardiac vibration signals, the algorithm has since been proven useful on a variety of cardiac signals [10,11] Table 3. Leave-one-out cross-validation of the training data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although originally developed for cardiac vibration signals, the algorithm has since been proven useful on a variety of cardiac signals [10,11] Table 3. Leave-one-out cross-validation of the training data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original algorithm was developed for the analysis of ballistocardiography and is based on the assumption that consecutive beats exhibit similar morphologies. Even so, the algorithm has proven useful for beat detection in clinical data [5] and for the reduction of false alarms in the intensive care unit [6]. For every window with index j of the signal of interest, the most likely interval η j as well as a quality metric q j is reported.…”
Section: Robust Interval Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, I selected the top-ranked algorithms of Pangerc et al [2], Johnson et al [3], Hoog Antink et al [4], de Cooman et al [5] and Vollmer [7] to analyze the robustness against noise in detail. A Linux system was appropriately configured (Lenovo IdeaCentre K330, Intel Core i5-2300 CPU @ 2.80GHz, 6GB RAM: openSUSE 13.2, Matlab 2015b, Compiler gcc-4.7.4, WFDB Toolbox von Physionet wfdb-10.5.24) to make detectors executable which were programmed in C or C++.…”
Section: Noise Stress Testmentioning
confidence: 99%