1995
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690410711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of gross erros in data reconciliation by principal component analysis

Abstract: Statistical testing prouides a tool for engineers and operators to judge the validity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each life stage, PCA was performed on the whole spectral reflectance dataset that included all fish from all light treatments, and the loadings of the various principal components (PCs) were obtained. Thereafter, the number of substantially contributing PCs was determined using a threshold criterion that compared the standard deviation of all PCs with the standard deviation of the first PC (Tong and Crowe, 1995). The loadings for the substantially contributing PCs were divided according to their respective treatments, and were used to test for differences between treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each life stage, PCA was performed on the whole spectral reflectance dataset that included all fish from all light treatments, and the loadings of the various principal components (PCs) were obtained. Thereafter, the number of substantially contributing PCs was determined using a threshold criterion that compared the standard deviation of all PCs with the standard deviation of the first PC (Tong and Crowe, 1995). The loadings for the substantially contributing PCs were divided according to their respective treatments, and were used to test for differences between treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,[15][16][17][18][19] Both methods project data onto lowerdimensional subspaces and use the Hotelling's T 2 or squared predicted error (SPE) indices to isolate the normal and abnormal conditions. 20,21 Other complementary MSPM approaches, including Fisher discriminant analysis (FDA), canonical variate analysis (CVA), independent components analysis (ICA), have been used to overcome some limitations in PCA/PLS-based monitoring schemes. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Meanwhile, machine learning techniques, e.g., discriminant analysis (DA), neural network (NN), expert systems, support vector machines (SVM), Bayesian belief network (BBN), and mutual information, have been explored to address the complex process monitoring problems with some success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confounding statistics may be misleading and may result in throwing away good data while keeping corrupted ones. Tong and Crowe (1995) presented a method based on principal component analysis (PCA) that appropriately handles the correlation among the variables.…”
Section: Statistical Tests For Gross Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%