Abstract:Highlights • ACC is suitable for the extraction and concentration of ignitable liquid residues • The sampling ability of ACS and ACC are comparable • The distance between the skin and the sorbent strongly influences the collection • The space between the hand and the glove or bag impacts the sampling of gasoline
“…Buchler et al examined five different collection methods with activated carbon cloth (ACC) and activated charcoal strips (ACS) for sampling ignitable liquids on hands [ 15 ]. ACC was shown to be as effective as ACS at recovering gasoline; however, distance between the adsorption material and skin and available headspace during sample collection were two key factors in extraction efficiency for both ACC and ACS.…”
“…Buchler et al examined five different collection methods with activated carbon cloth (ACC) and activated charcoal strips (ACS) for sampling ignitable liquids on hands [ 15 ]. ACC was shown to be as effective as ACS at recovering gasoline; however, distance between the adsorption material and skin and available headspace during sample collection were two key factors in extraction efficiency for both ACC and ACS.…”
Lipidomics in forensic science: a comprehensive review of applications in forensic toxicology, forensic pathology, forensic geology, and trace evidence analysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.