2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of gasoline on suspects’ hands: Study of different sampling alternatives

Abstract: Highlights • ACC is suitable for the extraction and concentration of ignitable liquid residues • The sampling ability of ACS and ACC are comparable • The distance between the skin and the sorbent strongly influences the collection • The space between the hand and the glove or bag impacts the sampling of gasoline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Buchler et al examined five different collection methods with activated carbon cloth (ACC) and activated charcoal strips (ACS) for sampling ignitable liquids on hands [ 15 ]. ACC was shown to be as effective as ACS at recovering gasoline; however, distance between the adsorption material and skin and available headspace during sample collection were two key factors in extraction efficiency for both ACC and ACS.…”
Section: Fire Debris Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buchler et al examined five different collection methods with activated carbon cloth (ACC) and activated charcoal strips (ACS) for sampling ignitable liquids on hands [ 15 ]. ACC was shown to be as effective as ACS at recovering gasoline; however, distance between the adsorption material and skin and available headspace during sample collection were two key factors in extraction efficiency for both ACC and ACS.…”
Section: Fire Debris Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%