2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of faint broad emission lines in type 2 AGN – I. Near-infrared observations and spectral fitting

Abstract: We present medium resolution near infrared spectroscopic observations of 41 obscured and intermediate class AGN (type 2, 1.9 and 1.8; AGN2) with redshift z 0.1, selected from the Swift/BAT 70-month catalogue. The observations have been carried out in the framework of a systematic study of the AGN2 near infrared spectral properties and have been executed using ISAAC/VLT, X-shooter/VLT and LUCI/LBT, reaching an average S/N ratio of ∼30 per resolution element. For those objects observed with X-shooter we also obt… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample has been extended with 4 AGN2 included in the Swift/BAT 70-month catalogue whose FWHM NIR lines, or spectra, were available in the literature. The spectral data, when available, have been fitted using the technique described in Onori et al (2017). In Table 1 we list the FWHM of the BLR components of the HeI and Paβ lines of the AGN2 sample (in the following called AGN2/BLR sample).…”
Section: Data and Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The sample has been extended with 4 AGN2 included in the Swift/BAT 70-month catalogue whose FWHM NIR lines, or spectra, were available in the literature. The spectral data, when available, have been fitted using the technique described in Onori et al (2017). In Table 1 we list the FWHM of the BLR components of the HeI and Paβ lines of the AGN2 sample (in the following called AGN2/BLR sample).…”
Section: Data and Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although based on few tens of objects, at face value our results imply that AGN2 have on average about 0.25 dex lower BLR FWHM, and 0.5 dex lower M BH (larger λ Edd ) than AGN1 of the same luminosity. In Onori et al (2017) we have investigated whether our FWHM measurements could be affected by some selection biases. No dependence was found in the sample where the BLR was measured on both the X-ray and NIR fluxes, on the orientation angle of the host galaxy or on the hydrogen column density, N H , measured in the X-ray band.…”
Section: Analysis Of Possible Selection Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A large number of works have already been carried out studying pointed X-ray observations (e.g., Winter et al 2009b;Ricci et al 2010;Tazaki et al 2011Tazaki et al , 2013Kawamuro et al 2016b;Tanimoto et al 2016;Marchesi et al 2017;Oda et al 2017) and the multiwavelength properties of Swift/BAT AGNs. This includes radio (e.g., Burlon et al 2013;Wong et al 2016), far-IR (e.g., Meléndez et al 2014;Mushotzky et al 2014;Shimizu et al 2015Shimizu et al , 2016, mid-IR (e.g., Meléndez et al 2008;Weaver et al 2010;Ichikawa et al 2012Ichikawa et al , 2017, near-IR (e.g., Mushotzky et al 2008;Lamperti et al 2017;Onori et al 2017aOnori et al , 2017bRicci et al 2017d), optical (e.g., Vasudevan et al 2009;Koss et al 2010;Winter et al 2010;Ueda et al 2015), and γ-ray (e.g., Sambruna et al 2010;Teng et al 2011) studies, as well as works focused on the host galaxy properties (e.g., Koss et al 2011b), on variability (e.g., Shimizu & Mushotzky 2013;Soldi et al 2014), and on peculiar sources (e.g., Koss et al 2012;Hogg et al 2012;Smith et al 2014;Schawinski et al 2015). Moreover, NuSTAR has been observing Swift/BAT AGNs since its launch in the framework of a legacy survey (M. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%