2013
DOI: 10.1080/03055698.2013.866888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of explanation obstacles in scientific texts: the effect of an understanding task vs. an experiment task

Abstract: The aim of this study is to analyse the effect of tasks on the detection of explanation obstacles when secondary school students read scientific texts. Students were instructed to read short passages under different task conditions, and to ask questions if necessary. Obstacle detection was operationalised in terms of the type of questions asked by the students. The experiment examined the influence of goals associated with the task of reading to understand a text vs. reading to perform a procedure described by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The alleged goal of the task proposed to the participants in the study was to provide suggestions about possible content to be included in a textbook. Goals have been shown to influence the difficulties found when readers process expository texts (Ishiwa et al, 2013;Morgado et al, 2014). Therefore, the particular task in this study probably had an effect on the participants' declared lack of knowledge, as they may have felt encouraged to generate unknowns that could conceivably be resolved by textbook content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The alleged goal of the task proposed to the participants in the study was to provide suggestions about possible content to be included in a textbook. Goals have been shown to influence the difficulties found when readers process expository texts (Ishiwa et al, 2013;Morgado et al, 2014). Therefore, the particular task in this study probably had an effect on the participants' declared lack of knowledge, as they may have felt encouraged to generate unknowns that could conceivably be resolved by textbook content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Students' awareness of structure, process, and general culture within the framework of scientific texts and environmental themes make their inclusion in sociocognitive practices more qualified (Engert & Krey, 2013;Eren, Bulut, & Bulut, 2015;Kazempour, 2014& Morgado, Otero, Vaz-Rebelo, Sanjosé, & Caldeira, 2014). Approaches in this context reflect different edges of the evaluations and interact with numerous different theoretical perspectives from literacy as a social practice to literacy as a cognitive skill and even to environmental literacy (Oliveira, 2015& Sjøberg, 2015.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La manifestación de un desconocimiento e incomprensión adecuados depende, al menos, de factores relacionados con la tarea, como leer para comprender una cierta información o leer con el propósito de llevar a cabo un procedimiento (MORGADO et al, 2014). Influyen también factores individuales, como el conocimiento del que procesa información, y factores contextuales como la clase de fuente que proporciona la información.…”
Section: Factores Que Influyen En La Manifestación Del Desconocimient...unclassified