2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-016-0768-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of depression in low resource settings: validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and cultural concepts of distress in Nepal

Abstract: BackgroundDespite recognition of the burden of disease due to mood disorders in low- and middle-income countries, there is a lack of consensus on best practices for detecting depression. Self-report screening tools, such as the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), require modification for low literacy populations and to assure cultural and clinical validity. An alternative approach is to employ idioms of distress that are locally salient, but these are not synonymous with psychiatric categories. Therefore, ou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
208
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
8
208
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lead author has used this method in a US-based ethnically Nepali Bhutanese refugee population experiencing high suicide rates (24). To assess histories of depression, we used the Nepali Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a widely-used instrument around the world that has been locally validated and proven to perform well in our target population: locally validated cutoff ≥ 10: sensitivity=0.94, specificity=0.80 (25). We also asked informants if the deceased experienced any mental illness (prompted with local terms for depression, schizophrenia, anxiety, and trauma) or if they were ever treated for one.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lead author has used this method in a US-based ethnically Nepali Bhutanese refugee population experiencing high suicide rates (24). To assess histories of depression, we used the Nepali Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a widely-used instrument around the world that has been locally validated and proven to perform well in our target population: locally validated cutoff ≥ 10: sensitivity=0.94, specificity=0.80 (25). We also asked informants if the deceased experienced any mental illness (prompted with local terms for depression, schizophrenia, anxiety, and trauma) or if they were ever treated for one.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PHQ-9 sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 88% for major depression [3,33]. PHQ-9 is also found to be a reliable and valid tool in different countries, including Ethiopia [34][35][36][37]. PHQ-9 consists of 9 items, and each item response is rated as "0" (not at all) to "3" (nearly every day), and the score can range from 0 to 27 [3,36].…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has conducted cross-cultural validation of psychiatric tools (e.g., Patient Health Questionnaire-9) [41], and implemented and studied packages of care (e.g., interventions for child soldiers and district-level general mental health interventions) [40, 42]. It has partnered with the Nepali government, and NGOs in Nepal and other low-resource countries [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%