2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of dengue cases by serological testing in a dengue vaccine efficacy trial: Utility for efficacy evaluation and impact of future vaccine introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, two of these cases were only serologically confirmed, which lacks specificity and bias towards false positives in CYD-TDV recipients. 23 These participants could have been seronegative at baseline, but as the influence of pre-vaccination serostatus was not part of the original study design, the serostatus of these participants with serologically confirmed cases was not assessed. It was not part of the original study design to split immunogenicity data by immune versus naïve, so performing sub-analyses based on pre-vaccination serostatus was not possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, two of these cases were only serologically confirmed, which lacks specificity and bias towards false positives in CYD-TDV recipients. 23 These participants could have been seronegative at baseline, but as the influence of pre-vaccination serostatus was not part of the original study design, the serostatus of these participants with serologically confirmed cases was not assessed. It was not part of the original study design to split immunogenicity data by immune versus naïve, so performing sub-analyses based on pre-vaccination serostatus was not possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serologic assays are used more widely but can lead to false-positive results during postvaccination surveillance. 42 With most surveillance unable to detect every dengue case, the capacity to monitor program baseline rates and the success of disease prevention remains limited.…”
Section: Remaining Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… a Several factors may generate possible suboptimal detection of NS1 (see text) b Asymptomatic or missed dengue infection occurring less than 3 months before testing c Residual dengue IgM elicited by CYD-TDV may last at least 2 months [ 4 ] d Flavivirus cross-reactive antibodies (in secondary infection) Abbreviations: DPO, days post onset; IgM, immunoglobin M; Pos, Positive result; Neg, Negative result; Pos/Neg, the sensitivity of the test, the time point of serum sampling, and the serological status of the patient may affect the result …”
Section: Dengue Diagnostics and Their Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vaccine clinical monitoring and careful diagnosis of the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations enrolled in these studies have provided valuable information that is useful for the later stage of vaccination implementation and its monitoring [ 2 ]. A recent study of the validity of the serological diagnosis of dengue immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) by ELISA according to WHO recommendations [ 3 ] in acute febrile and in convalescent individuals vaccinated and unvaccinated (Placebo), and virologically confirmed or not, showed a high sensitivity (97.1%) but a low specificity (85.1%) in the IgM ELISA due to the presence of residual IgM from previous vaccination or subclinical undetected dengue, which may introduce a diagnostic bias [ 4 ]. The proportion of false positives IgM in the CYD-TDV vaccinated group (17.4%) was higher than in the control group (10.1%), particularly within the 2 months following vaccination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%