2017
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of CS in Neptune’s atmosphere from ALMA observations

Abstract: Context. The large and vertically non-uniform abundance of CO in Neptune's atmosphere has been interpreted as the result of past cometary impact(s), either single or distributed in size and time, which could also be at the origin of Neptune's HCN. Aims. We aim to provide observational support for this scenario by searching for other comet-induced species, in particular carbon sulfide (CS) which has been observed continuously in Jupiter since the 1994 Shoemaker-Levy 9 impacts. Methods. In April 2016 we used the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a reduced K in the 0.1-0.5 bar range is plausible, and is also in line with requirements from recent photochemical modelling (Moses et al, 2018). In this case the external CO source would also still be compatible with the giant comet impact proposed by (Lellouch et al, 2005) and supported by (Moreno et al, 2017). The silicate-rich Neptune suggested by Feuchtgruber et al (2013) would then be more compatible with the available observations than a water-rich Neptune.…”
Section: Neptune's Formation and Internal Structuresupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, a reduced K in the 0.1-0.5 bar range is plausible, and is also in line with requirements from recent photochemical modelling (Moses et al, 2018). In this case the external CO source would also still be compatible with the giant comet impact proposed by (Lellouch et al, 2005) and supported by (Moreno et al, 2017). The silicate-rich Neptune suggested by Feuchtgruber et al (2013) would then be more compatible with the available observations than a water-rich Neptune.…”
Section: Neptune's Formation and Internal Structuresupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The large concentration of CO in Neptune's stratosphere led Lellouch et al (2005) to suggest that the source of Neptune's CO could be a large cometary impact that occurred ⇠200 years ago. This hypothesis is supported by the recent detection of CS by Moreno et al (2017), an impact product that was also detected after the Shoemaker-Levy 9 impact on Jupiter (Moreno et al, 2003). Moreno et al (2017) suggest a slightly larger 4 km diameter comet impacting ⇠1000 years ago.…”
Section: Phosphine (Phmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These species have presumably been formed during the comet impact by shock chemistry (Zahnle, 1996). Such events seem to be ubiquitous in the outer Solar System (see Cavalié et al 2009Cavalié et al , 2010 for Saturn, Cavalié et al 2014 for Uranus, and Lellouch et al 2005, Moreno et al 2017 for Neptune). Interestingly, tracing the evolution of the spatial distribution (both vertical and horizontal) of these rather long-lived species can provide us with an insight on the Jovian upper stratospheric dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Herschel CO spectra have been modelled with a line-by-line radiative transfer model, which takes into account the spherical geometry and broadening due to planetary rotation, developed for Jupiter (Moreno et al 2001) and also used for Neptune (Moreno et al 2017). The CO opacity parameters were taken from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory molecular line catalogue (Pickett et al 1998); the collision-induced absorption opacity due to the main compounds of the Uranus atmosphere (H 2 -H 2 , H 2 -He, and H 2 -CH 4 ) adopt codes developed by Borysow et al (1985Borysow et al ( , 1988 and Borysow & Frommhold (1986).…”
Section: Radiative Transfer Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%