2018
DOI: 10.3390/rs10071020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Cropland Change Using Multi-Harmonic Based Phenological Trajectory Similarity

Abstract: Accurate information on cropland changes is critical for food production and security, sustainable cropland management, and global change studies. The common change detection methods bi-temporal based, using remotely sensed imagery easily generate pseudo changes due to phenological or seasonal differences. Cropland exhibits a distinctive phenological trajectory that has strong periodic characteristics and seasonal paths. This paper proposes the use of phenological trajectory similarity to search for the overal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the phenological trajectory of all kinds of land cover categories, including farmland with complex intra-annual variations (such as double-or even triple-crop patterns within a year), must be well described for land cover change detection and classification before and after abrupt change. However, the CCDC just adopted a simple sinusoidal model for the phenological trajectory description for a variety of land cover categories, which means it cannot answer any one of four questions in Dongting Lake region with complex change processes [21,33]. Although the BFAST algorithm exhibits difficulty in interpreting the land cover categories before and after the detected abrupt changes, a multi-harmonic model adopted in BFAST could be satisfactory for the complex shape of phenological trajectory and could be applied in the Dongting Lake region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the phenological trajectory of all kinds of land cover categories, including farmland with complex intra-annual variations (such as double-or even triple-crop patterns within a year), must be well described for land cover change detection and classification before and after abrupt change. However, the CCDC just adopted a simple sinusoidal model for the phenological trajectory description for a variety of land cover categories, which means it cannot answer any one of four questions in Dongting Lake region with complex change processes [21,33]. Although the BFAST algorithm exhibits difficulty in interpreting the land cover categories before and after the detected abrupt changes, a multi-harmonic model adopted in BFAST could be satisfactory for the complex shape of phenological trajectory and could be applied in the Dongting Lake region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CCDC performs the worst in comparison to the other algorithms, with the lowest overall accuracy of 92.97%, and Kappa coefficient of 0.842. This is because the simple harmonic model adopted by CCDC is incompatible with the complex phenological dynamics of cultivated land with more than one growing season [19]. The omission errors of the proposed algorithm are mainly due to the mixture of different land covers within the same pixel.…”
Section: Accuracy Assessment For Change Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the view of this, making use of the seasonal information contained in dense time stacks of satellite images is more advantageous [18]. Satellite image time series (SITS), which provide more vegetation phenology information, have been used for farmland change detection [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Trajectory-based change detection is an inevitable choice to do this work by constructing a 'curve' or profile of full temporal records for each pixel. Nowadays, the method has been successfully applied in forest-related change analyses [47,48], land use classification [49,50], and cropland variations [51].…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of The Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%