Abstract:Conservation efforts are investigating the impact of diseases within a species of interest, including prevalence and transmission and morbidity and mortality rates. However, the majority of these studies focus solely on the characteristics of a single pathogen. Recently, the role of copathogens has been reported to impact disease susceptibility and mortality. To that effect, a survey was conducted including 318 eastern box turtles ( Terrapene carolina carolina) from populations in Illinois and Tennessee in 201… Show more
“…Following this, ranaviruses were predominantly isolated from box turtles ( Terrapene carolina ) and were identified as the aetiological agent of ‘red neck disease’ in the soft-shelled turtle ( Pelodiscus sinensis ) (Chen, Zheng & Jiang, 1999). In the last decade, several new reports of ranaviral infections in Testudines have been published (Johnson et al, 2008; Johnson et al, 2010; Belzer & Seibert, 2011; Allender, 2012; Stöhr et al., 2015; Perpiñán et al, 2016; Butkus et al, 2017; Agha et al, 2017; Archer et al, 2017; Adamovicz et al, 2018). Despite the increasing number of reports of infections in the Testudines, ranaviral disease in these reptiles is still likely to be underreported due to a lack of awareness, an incomplete understanding of the pathology caused by the disease, few long-term studies, and minimal population monitoring (Duffus et al, 2015).…”
Section: Distribution Host Range and Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reptilian hosts of ranaviruses experience a range of histological changes including necrosis and inflammation of the respiratory tract, pneumonia, conjunctivitis, stomatitis, esophagitis, tracheitis, necrosis of endothelial cells and the submucosa of the gastrointestinal tract, glomerulonephritis, multifocal hepatic necrosis, splenitis, intracytoplasmic inclusion bodies in many tissues, and necrotizing myositis (see Table 1). Evidence from epizootics in reptiles indicates that ranaviral infection can be accompanied by secondary pathogens that may exacerbate the disease and mask clinical signs of ranaviral infection (Stohr et al, 2013; Sim et al, 2016; Archer et al, 2017).…”
Ranaviruses can infect many vertebrate classes including fish, amphibians and reptiles, but for the most part, research has been focused on non-reptilian hosts, amphibians in particular. More recently, reports of ranaviral infections of reptiles are increasing with over 12 families of reptiles currently susceptible to ranaviral infection. Reptiles are infected by ranaviruses that are genetically similar to, or the same as, the viruses that infect amphibians and fish; however, physiological and ecological differences result in differences in study designs. Although ranaviral disease in reptiles is often influenced by host species, viral strain and environmental differences, general trends in pathogenesis are emerging. More experimental studies using a variety of reptile species, life stages and routes of transmission are required to unravel the complexity of wild ranavirus transmission. Further, our understanding of the reptilian immune response to ranaviral infection is still lacking, although the considerable amount of work conducted in amphibians will serve as a useful guide for future studies in reptiles.
“…Following this, ranaviruses were predominantly isolated from box turtles ( Terrapene carolina ) and were identified as the aetiological agent of ‘red neck disease’ in the soft-shelled turtle ( Pelodiscus sinensis ) (Chen, Zheng & Jiang, 1999). In the last decade, several new reports of ranaviral infections in Testudines have been published (Johnson et al, 2008; Johnson et al, 2010; Belzer & Seibert, 2011; Allender, 2012; Stöhr et al., 2015; Perpiñán et al, 2016; Butkus et al, 2017; Agha et al, 2017; Archer et al, 2017; Adamovicz et al, 2018). Despite the increasing number of reports of infections in the Testudines, ranaviral disease in these reptiles is still likely to be underreported due to a lack of awareness, an incomplete understanding of the pathology caused by the disease, few long-term studies, and minimal population monitoring (Duffus et al, 2015).…”
Section: Distribution Host Range and Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reptilian hosts of ranaviruses experience a range of histological changes including necrosis and inflammation of the respiratory tract, pneumonia, conjunctivitis, stomatitis, esophagitis, tracheitis, necrosis of endothelial cells and the submucosa of the gastrointestinal tract, glomerulonephritis, multifocal hepatic necrosis, splenitis, intracytoplasmic inclusion bodies in many tissues, and necrotizing myositis (see Table 1). Evidence from epizootics in reptiles indicates that ranaviral infection can be accompanied by secondary pathogens that may exacerbate the disease and mask clinical signs of ranaviral infection (Stohr et al, 2013; Sim et al, 2016; Archer et al, 2017).…”
Ranaviruses can infect many vertebrate classes including fish, amphibians and reptiles, but for the most part, research has been focused on non-reptilian hosts, amphibians in particular. More recently, reports of ranaviral infections of reptiles are increasing with over 12 families of reptiles currently susceptible to ranaviral infection. Reptiles are infected by ranaviruses that are genetically similar to, or the same as, the viruses that infect amphibians and fish; however, physiological and ecological differences result in differences in study designs. Although ranaviral disease in reptiles is often influenced by host species, viral strain and environmental differences, general trends in pathogenesis are emerging. More experimental studies using a variety of reptile species, life stages and routes of transmission are required to unravel the complexity of wild ranavirus transmission. Further, our understanding of the reptilian immune response to ranaviral infection is still lacking, although the considerable amount of work conducted in amphibians will serve as a useful guide for future studies in reptiles.
“…ranavirus, Mycoplasma sp., herpesviruses, adenovirus) and toxicants (e.g. organochlorines, heavy metals); underscoring the need for reliable tools to characterize emerging health threats [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. Acute phase response testing in box turtles may supplement existing diagnostic modalities and improve health assessment protocols; ultimately supporting conservation goals and enhancing the evaluation of ecosystem wellness [41].…”
The acute phase response is a highly conserved reaction to infection, inflammation, trauma, stress, and neoplasia. Acute phase assays are useful for wildlife health assessment, however, they are infrequently utilized in reptiles. This study evaluated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in eastern (Terrapene carolina carolina) and ornate box turtles (Terrapene ornata ornata) and hemoglobin-binding protein (HBP) in T. ornata. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate in 90 T. carolina and 105 T. ornata was negatively associated with packed cell volume and was greater in unhealthy turtles (p < 0.05). Female T. ornata had higher ESR values than males (p < 0.05). Measurement of ESR with a microhematocrit tube proportionally overestimated values from a commercial kit (Winpette), though both methods may retain utility with separate reference intervals. Hemoglobin-binding protein concentration in 184 T. ornata was significantly increased in adults and unhealthy turtles (p < 0.05). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate values were similar between seasons and populations, and HBP values were consistent between years, indicating that these analytes may have more stable baseline values than traditional health metrics in reptiles. This study demonstrates that ESR and HBP are promising diagnostics for health assessment in wild box turtles. Incorporating these tests into wild herptile health assessment protocols may support conservation efforts and improve ecosystem health monitoring.
“…Other authors have also described the detection of adenoviruses by PCR in free-ranging reptiles. Adenoviruses have twice been detected in freeranging eastern box turtles (Terrapene carolina carolina) from Illinois and Tennessee (Archer et al, 2017;Adamovicz et al, 2018). They have also been detected in lizards from Spain and islands north of Africa (Szirovicza et al, 2016) and Gila monsters (Heloderma (Benge et al, 2019).…”
Adenoviruses are a relatively common infection of reptiles globally and are most often reported in captive central bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps). We report the first evidence of adenoviruses in bearded dragons in their native habitat in Australia. Oral-cloacal swabs and blood samples were collected from 48 free-ranging bearded dragons from four study populations: western bearded dragons (P. minor minor) from Western Australia (n = 4), central bearded dragons (P. vitticeps) from central Australia (n = 2) and western New South Wales (NSW) (n = 29), and coastal bearded dragons (P. barbata) from southeast Queensland (n = 13). Samples were tested for the presence of adenoviruses using a broadly reactive (panadenovirus) PCR and a PCR specific for agamid adenovirus-1. Agamid adenovirus-1 was detected in swabs from eight of the dragons from western NSW and one of the coastal bearded dragons. Lizard atadenovirus A was detected in one of the dragons from western NSW. Adenoviruses were not detected in any blood sample. All bearded dragons, except one, were apparently healthy and so finding these adenoviruses in these animals is consistent with bearded dragons being natural hosts for these viruses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.