2000
DOI: 10.1002/1098-2264(200008)28:4<370::aid-gcc2>3.0.co;2-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of chromosome imbalances in retinoblastoma by parallel karyotype and CGH analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
49
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two of the three patients (026 and 054) were diagnosed at less than 12 months (7 and 3 months, respectively) whilst the third patient (050) presented at 67 months. Contrary to the findings by Mairal et al (2000) that tumours with amplification of N-MYC show mild differentiation, all three tumours studied here were poorly differentiated. All three patients are alive at 108 (026), 65 (050) and 54 (054) factors thereby strengthening a lack of association of multiple copies of N-MYC with poor outcome.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the three patients (026 and 054) were diagnosed at less than 12 months (7 and 3 months, respectively) whilst the third patient (050) presented at 67 months. Contrary to the findings by Mairal et al (2000) that tumours with amplification of N-MYC show mild differentiation, all three tumours studied here were poorly differentiated. All three patients are alive at 108 (026), 65 (050) and 54 (054) factors thereby strengthening a lack of association of multiple copies of N-MYC with poor outcome.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The most prevalent karyotypic abnormality in retinoblastoma is gain of portions of the long arm of chromosome 1, seen in 21 of 27 tumors (Squire et al, 1985). At the higher resolution of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), gain of a minimal region spanning 1q31 is the most common change seen in retinoblastoma in our study (Chen et al, 2001), and was seen cumulatively in 76/162 (47%) tumors across five published studies ( Figure 1a) (Mairal et al, 2000;Chen et al, 2001;Herzog et al, 2001;Lillington et al, 2002;van der Wal et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Gains or ampli®cations along the long arm of chromosome 1 are found in leukaemias and solid tumours, and are among the most common chromosomal anomalies in human neoplasia (Alers et al, 2000;Kiechle et al, 2000;Mairal et al, 2000;Malamou-Mitsi et al, 1999;Matthews et al, 2000;Weber et al, 2000a,b). Local gain or high-level ampli®cation a ecting mainly 1q21-q23 has been reported for breast cancer cell lines (1q21-q32) (Larramendy et al, 2000), hepatocellular carcinomas (1q12-q22) (Guan et al, 2000), retinoblastomas (1q21) (Mairal et al, 2000) and sarcomas (Forus et al, 1995a,b;Szymanska et al, 1997;Tarkkanen et al, 1995), and is of particular interest since they appear more frequently in aggressive tumours with metastatic potential (Alers et al, 2000;Gronwald et al, 1997;Tarkkanen et al, 1999) and resistance to chemotherapy (Kudoh et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local gain or high-level ampli®cation a ecting mainly 1q21-q23 has been reported for breast cancer cell lines (1q21-q32) (Larramendy et al, 2000), hepatocellular carcinomas (1q12-q22) (Guan et al, 2000), retinoblastomas (1q21) (Mairal et al, 2000) and sarcomas (Forus et al, 1995a,b;Szymanska et al, 1997;Tarkkanen et al, 1995), and is of particular interest since they appear more frequently in aggressive tumours with metastatic potential (Alers et al, 2000;Gronwald et al, 1997;Tarkkanen et al, 1999) and resistance to chemotherapy (Kudoh et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%