1977
DOI: 10.1038/265224a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of change in rotation measure of the Vela pulsar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The original value of Radhakrishnan & Cooke (1969) is ( 0 \ with an uncertainty of B5¡. Hamilton et al (1977) made 47¡ measurements over several years, all of which are consistent with A detailed decomposition into four ( 0 \ 64¡^1¡ .5. separate pulse components was performed by Krishnamohan & Downs (1983), in which they concluded that one of the components was polarized in the mode orthogonal to the other three. However, they did not attempt an absolute measurement of the angle Bietenholz et al (1991) mea-( 0 .…”
Section: Fig 8è(a)mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The original value of Radhakrishnan & Cooke (1969) is ( 0 \ with an uncertainty of B5¡. Hamilton et al (1977) made 47¡ measurements over several years, all of which are consistent with A detailed decomposition into four ( 0 \ 64¡^1¡ .5. separate pulse components was performed by Krishnamohan & Downs (1983), in which they concluded that one of the components was polarized in the mode orthogonal to the other three. However, they did not attempt an absolute measurement of the angle Bietenholz et al (1991) mea-( 0 .…”
Section: Fig 8è(a)mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…There are a number of cases in which the RM differs significantly from previous values, in particular that of the Vela pulsar. In 1977, the RM of the Vela pulsar was found to be 38 rad m −2 (Hamilton et al 1977b). In a later paper, Hamilton, Hall & Costa (1985) showed that the RM had increased to 46 rad m −2 and in fact appeared to be linearly increasing since at least 1970.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hamilton et al (1977Hamilton et al ( , 1985 analyze the variations of RM and DM for the Vela pulsar, finding an approximately linear variation in both with slopes of 0.73 rad m −2 yr −1 and −0.04 cm −3 pc yr −1 for RM and DM respectively. They interpret the RM and DM variations as the result of the relative motion of a magnetized filament of the Vela supernova remnant across the line-of-sight and estimated the electron density and the effective mean line-of-sight component of magnetic field in the filament.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%