2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2009.5334223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of cardiac activity using a 5.8 GHz radio frequency sensor

Abstract: A 5.8-GHz ISM-Band radio-frequency sensor has been developed for non-contact measurement of respiration and heart rate from stationary and semi-stationary subjects at a distance of 0.5 to 1.5 meters. We report on the accuracy of the heart rate measurements obtained using two algorithmic approaches, as compared to a reference heart rate obtained using a pulse oximeter. Simultaneous Photoplethysmograph (PPG) and non-contact sensor recordings were recorded over fifteen minute periods for ten healthy subjects (8M/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have reported some commendable achievements, such as error of less than 0.5 breath per minute for respiratory rate and one beat per minute for heart rate [26,27,61]. In addition, the achieved accuracy of Doppler radar in measuring physiological parameters, such as respiratory rate is 92% [39], heart rate is 88% [39,59,81] to 91% [40], and with the addition of harmonics interference, the average error can be reduced further to 3.2% [84]. However, conventional FFT may not always be able to reliably separate the rich sinusoidal components due to smearing and leakage problems, particularly from the limited data samples [74].…”
Section: Time-frequency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Studies have reported some commendable achievements, such as error of less than 0.5 breath per minute for respiratory rate and one beat per minute for heart rate [26,27,61]. In addition, the achieved accuracy of Doppler radar in measuring physiological parameters, such as respiratory rate is 92% [39], heart rate is 88% [39,59,81] to 91% [40], and with the addition of harmonics interference, the average error can be reduced further to 3.2% [84]. However, conventional FFT may not always be able to reliably separate the rich sinusoidal components due to smearing and leakage problems, particularly from the limited data samples [74].…”
Section: Time-frequency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in hardware circuitry design, antenna exploratory, signal processing techniques, and classification algorithms have also been explored. However, the main challenges in using Doppler radar systems for physiological measurement is still the analysis and processing of the received signal data [59].…”
Section: Non-contact Doppler Radar Signal Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A system for wearable respiration monitoring system based on digital respiratory inductive plethysmography has been described by We et al [4]. In their design of respiration rate meter, Vasu et al and Choi et al used radio frequency sensors [15,16], whereas Miwa and Sakai [17] proposed the use of body sound for the development of a heart rate and respiration measurement system. Implementation of optical methods, ultrasonic proximity sensor, impedance plethysmography, ECG signal (via wavelet), facial tracking method and real-time vision based system are also studied by Scalise et al [18], Min et al [19], Ansari et al [20], Santo and Carbajal [21], Khalidi et al [6] and Tan et al [1] respectively regarding the measurement of respiration rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%