“…Studies with low (arbitrarily defined as <90%) prevalence of H. pylori infection in DU patients were chosen (Table 3). 10, 13, 17, 25, 26, 27–30, 32, 33, 35, 37, 40–43, 49, 50, 52, 53, 56–58, 61, 62, 65, 66, 68, 69, 71–73, 75–81, 104, 148, 149, 164, 190–198, 199, 200 The following variables were extracted, with the intention to explain the low prevalence of the infection in these studies: year of publication, nationality of the authors, study design, number of patients included, prevalence of H. pylori infection, percentage of NSAID use in H. pylori ‐negative DU patients, prevalence of H. pylori in DU after excluding NSAIDs, diagnostic methods used (and definition of H. pylori positivity), location of biopsy samples (antrum, body or both), exclusion of patients with previous PPIs or antibiotic use, or with bleeding DU and finally, age of population (children or adults).…”