2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of C. difficile toxin as a model assay for performing fully automated high-throughput RT-PCR on clinical stool samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Implementation on a fully-automated high-throughput sample-to-result platform like the cobas6800 further improves speed and scalability (sample-to-result time of approx. 3.5 h and throughput of 386 samples per 8 h [30]). Depending on local needs, users may be able to use existing SNP-assays to assemble customized multiplex-panels for circulating lineages, or use the design principles outlined above to implement additional assays when new Spike gene SNPs become relevant in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementation on a fully-automated high-throughput sample-to-result platform like the cobas6800 further improves speed and scalability (sample-to-result time of approx. 3.5 h and throughput of 386 samples per 8 h [30]). Depending on local needs, users may be able to use existing SNP-assays to assemble customized multiplex-panels for circulating lineages, or use the design principles outlined above to implement additional assays when new Spike gene SNPs become relevant in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Roche has since received “Emergency use authorization” by the FDA for their own SARS-CoV-2 IVD assay and have made the test available commercially [ 12 ]. This provides a common ground across different testing sites for quantification of RT-PCR data, especially when taking the high inter-run consistency of the instrument into account, as previously demonstrated for other clinical targets [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a comparison, EIA against GDH or EIA against toxin A/B can reach 10 3 CFU/g (feces) [58] . The LOD of PCR assays varies from 10 1 to 10 4 CFU/mL (CFU/g) [59–61] . Overall, RFD‐CD2 based assays displayed very comparable LODs with these two detection methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[58] The LOD of PCR assays varies from 10 1 to 10 4 CFU/mL (CFU/g). [59][60][61] Overall, RFD-CD2 based assays displayed very comparable LODs with these two detection methods. The culturing methods, however, can reach an LOD of 10 1 to 10 2 CFU/mL depending on the recovery method.…”
Section: Detection Sensitivity Of Rfd-cd2 As a Fluorescent Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%