2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-17935-9_46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Breast Cancer Using Infrared Thermography and Deep Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Baffa and Lattari [23], Fernández-Ovies et al [24], and Tello-Mijares et al [25] use a Convolutional Neural Network to classify patients into healthy and unhealthy using thermal images from the DMR-IR database [26]. Baffa and Lattari [23] used DIT (for final diagnosis) and SIT (for initial screening of cases) and obtained 98% of average accuracy with DIT images and 95% with SIT images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Baffa and Lattari [23], Fernández-Ovies et al [24], and Tello-Mijares et al [25] use a Convolutional Neural Network to classify patients into healthy and unhealthy using thermal images from the DMR-IR database [26]. Baffa and Lattari [23] used DIT (for final diagnosis) and SIT (for initial screening of cases) and obtained 98% of average accuracy with DIT images and 95% with SIT images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our results to those studies and summarize such comparisons in Table 14. [20,21], Fernández-Ovies et al [24], Sánchez-Ruiz et al [28], and Silva et al [22,27] do not use the F1-score to assess the classifiers' performance. On the other hand, only Baffa and Lattari [23] and Tello-Mijares et al [25] present an F1-score higher than ours, but both use CNN.…”
Section: Comparison With Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sonuçlar Adam optimizasyon algoritması kullanılarak optimize edilmiştir [43]. Kızılötesi termografiye dayalı olarak meme kanserinin erken teşhisi için karşılaştırmalı olarak ESA performansını inceleyen Fernandez-Ovies ve Andres [44] ResNet18, ResNet34, ResNet50, ResNet152, VGG16 ve VGG19'un ESA mimarileri Fast.ai ve Pytorch kütüphanelerini kullanarak uygulamışlardır. Bu karşılaştırmanın sonucunda, ResNet50'nin %98,75 doğrulukla en iyi sınıflandırmayı sağladığı; ancak ResNet50'nin Res-Net34'e kıyasla daha az kararlı olduğu ifade edilmiştir.…”
Section: Meme Kanseriunclassified
“…A comparison of the performance of CNN for early detection of breast cancer based on infrared thermography was undertaken previously [124]. CNN architectures of ResNet18, ResNet34, ResNet50, ResNet152, VGG16, and VGG19 were implemented using Fast.ai and Pytorch libraries.…”
Section: Research On Breast Thermogram Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%