2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2014.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of bacteria and fungi in blood of patients with febrile neutropenia by real-time PCR with universal primers and probes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar limitations have been encountered by other authors using in-house or commercially available PCR-based assays (Teranishi et al 2015;Ziegler et al 2016), designed to detect infectious agents directly in blood samples.…”
Section: Rapid Methods For Detection Of Microorganisms Directly In Bl...mentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar limitations have been encountered by other authors using in-house or commercially available PCR-based assays (Teranishi et al 2015;Ziegler et al 2016), designed to detect infectious agents directly in blood samples.…”
Section: Rapid Methods For Detection Of Microorganisms Directly In Bl...mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The possibility to rapidly detect and identify microbial pathogens directly in blood samples from patients with suspected sepsis is an attractive goal since it would allow to obtain precious diagnostic information in a few hours from blood drawing. Most of the proposed solutions involve the use of PCR assays specifically designed to detect microorganisms in blood samples (Mencacci et al 2012;Pasqualini et al 2012;Gosiewski et al 2014;Teranishi et al 2015;Ziegler et al 2016). To this aim, Gosiewski et al (2014) compared four in-house developed methods (nested PCR, multiplex PCR, qPCR, and FISH) and the SeptiFast assay with the BacT/ALERT 3D blood culture system (bioM erieux) for their ability to detect the presence of microbes in 71 blood samples of patients with clinical symptoms of sepsis.…”
Section: Rapid Methods For Detection Of Microorganisms Directly In Bl...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding inconsistent with previous observations, detecting the infecting microorganisms in only 20–30% of FN episodes. 21,22 Accordingly, this may partially explain the physicians’ deviation from guideline recommendations. The persistence of fever might have encouraged physicians to add or switch antibiotics empirically when the source of infection could not be found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid development of molecular biology technology, PCR technology was considered to be a good choice in addition to the above techniques, and has been more commonly applied to pathogenic microorganism detection. Compared with traditional methods, PCR technology has the advantages of high specificity, sensitivity, and rapidity [26,27]. However, PCR requires expensive thermal cycling equipment, and finally requires agarose gel electrophoresis to further verify the detection results, which was time-consuming and inapplicable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%