2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.08.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Babesia and Theileria species infection in cattle from Portugal using a reverse line blotting method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
14
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These data are similar to those found by other authors in Italy, Spain, Portugal and Tunisia [13,14,15, 22, 27] and constitute further evidence of the high prevalence of T. buffeli, indicating that it may be the most common piroplasm in the Mediterranean basin. T. buffeli is considered a non-pathogenic or scarcely pathogenic species, although some cases of disease have been reported [9, 29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data are similar to those found by other authors in Italy, Spain, Portugal and Tunisia [13,14,15, 22, 27] and constitute further evidence of the high prevalence of T. buffeli, indicating that it may be the most common piroplasm in the Mediterranean basin. T. buffeli is considered a non-pathogenic or scarcely pathogenic species, although some cases of disease have been reported [9, 29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…B. bovis was found in 1.6% (24/1,500) of the samples, which is in line with reports from Portugal and Spain [13, 27], while slightly higher percentages were observed in Sicily and Tunisia [14, 22]. The abundant presence, in KR5, of Boophilus annulatus ticks, a vector of B. bovis , might explain the higher positive rate of B. bovis in the same area.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Nucleic acid-based methods offer a variety of tools for the diagnosis of parasites. Generally, the detection and diagnosis of piroplasmosis consist of molecular methods, which are as following: (1) PCR (Almeria et al 2001;Yin et al 2008); (2) reverse line blotting (RLB) (Almeria et al 2002;Niu et al 2009;Silva et al 2010); (3) real time PCR (Jaffer et al 2010); (4) LAMP Salih et al 2008). None of Sun et al (2008) these methods could be considered better than another.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Portugal, the importance of theileriosis is becoming increasingly recognised (Branco et al, 2010;Silva et al, 2010) and a recent epidemiological study determined an increased prevalence in the south of the country. In a crosssectional study in Southern Portugal, around 30% of cattle were found to be infected within an area that represents around 50% of this country's cattle population .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%