2000
DOI: 10.1067/mjd.2000.104895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of artificial changes in mole size by skin self-examination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, our study was focused on the best way to teach a direct morphological recognition of melanoma, but other useful indirect alert messages based on surveillance, i.e. ''a recent change'' or ''E'' criteria, 16 and comparison, i.e. the ''ugly duckling sign'' 17 could not be investigated in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, our study was focused on the best way to teach a direct morphological recognition of melanoma, but other useful indirect alert messages based on surveillance, i.e. ''a recent change'' or ''E'' criteria, 16 and comparison, i.e. the ''ugly duckling sign'' 17 could not be investigated in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prospective study of the effectiveness of SSE is needed; however, the logistic constraints in conducting such a study are obvious. In a preliminary study by Muhn et al, 11 the efficacy of SSE to detect changes in mole size has been investigated in high-risk patients. 11 The specificity of SSE was 62% and the sensitivities of detecting 2-mm and 4-mm changes were 58% and 75%, respectively.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a preliminary study by Muhn et al, 11 the efficacy of SSE to detect changes in mole size has been investigated in high-risk patients. 11 The specificity of SSE was 62% and the sensitivities of detecting 2-mm and 4-mm changes were 58% and 75%, respectively. In a recent study by Dawid et al, 12 the ability of patients to identify real changes in melanocytic nevi was evaluated in 251 patients with 1431 melanocytic nevi.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most studies contributing to the evidence for SSE are small, use a non-randomised pre-post study design or test accuracy of detecting change in skin lesions which are artificially enlarged [9]. In the study by Muhn et al [11], artificial change was examined by artificially increasing mole size on participants’ backs, and then they were asked to detect any increases in size. Key studies on the role that technology could play in enhancing SSE show consumers recognise melanoma better from dermoscopic images than from clinical photographs [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%