2017
DOI: 10.3390/rs9020118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Archaeological Residues in Vegetated Areas Using Satellite Synthetic Aperture Radar

Abstract: Buried archaeological structures, such as earthworks and buildings, often leave traces at the surface by altering the properties of overlying material, such as soil and vegetation. These traces may be better visible from a remote perspective than on the surface. Active and passive airborne and spaceborne sensors acquiring imagery from the ultraviolet to infrared have been shown to reveal these archaeological residues following the application of various processing techniques. While the active microwave region … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SAR data have been then used for archaeological feature extraction, by interpreting backscattering anomalies due to differences in the dielectric properties, humidity, vegetation coverage, roughness and orientation of the archaeological features. The SAR data used are Cosmo SkyMed in Stripmaps HIMAGE mode (3X3 m pixel), filtered on the random multiplicative noise (speckle caused by multiple backscatter sources) with multi-looking filters (Stewart, 2017) and Gamma and Gaussian Filtering. The Intensity Processing stacking of SARScape have been followed, that is a combination of single and multiple ANLD and De Grandi Spatio-temporal Filterings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAR data have been then used for archaeological feature extraction, by interpreting backscattering anomalies due to differences in the dielectric properties, humidity, vegetation coverage, roughness and orientation of the archaeological features. The SAR data used are Cosmo SkyMed in Stripmaps HIMAGE mode (3X3 m pixel), filtered on the random multiplicative noise (speckle caused by multiple backscatter sources) with multi-looking filters (Stewart, 2017) and Gamma and Gaussian Filtering. The Intensity Processing stacking of SARScape have been followed, that is a combination of single and multiple ANLD and De Grandi Spatio-temporal Filterings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of site condition assessment and monitoring of landscape disturbance, it is worth mentioning the potential use of interferometric coherence to identify archaeological residues in vegetated areas [22].…”
Section: Condition Assessment and Monitoring Of Landscape Disturbancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, knowledge of the crop type and height would be advantageous to establish a correlation between the observed coherence and crops. If the residues are located in topographic depressions, coherence anomalies could be the result of topography-induced moisture and soil differences resulting in differential vegetation growth [22]. A combined analysis of radar backscatter anomalies is always recommended, in order to search for association with coherent patterns.…”
Section: Condition Assessment and Monitoring Of Landscape Disturbancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, weak archaeological signatures have been further enhanced by approaches based on multi‐temporal averaging (Chen, Jiang, et al, ). With respect to vegetation archaeological proxy indicators, a significant contribution has been recently provided by Stewart () and Jiang et al ().…”
Section: Overview Of Sar Remote Sensing In Cultural Heritage Applicatmentioning
confidence: 99%