2002
DOI: 10.1006/mssp.2001.1449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Anomalous Structural Behaviour Using Wavelet Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data-driven methods are typically based on statistical or signal processing techniques such as moving principal component analysis [14] and wavelet transforms [15]. Existing data-driven approaches focus on the analysis of response measurements and ignore distributed temperature measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data-driven methods are typically based on statistical or signal processing techniques such as moving principal component analysis [14] and wavelet transforms [15]. Existing data-driven approaches focus on the analysis of response measurements and ignore distributed temperature measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well as providing information long term creep and short term linear stress-strain relationships, the data have been used [23,24] for developing procedures for detecting performance anomalies. In particular, the recording during the construction process provided valu-able information on early-life strain development and reference characteristics for events such as post-tensioning and concrete pouring.…”
Section: Tuas Second Link: Long Term Performance Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moyo and Brownjohn [11] applied the wavelet analysis and Omenzetter and Brownjohn [12] used Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) models to identify events and changes in the structural state in a bridge. Lanata and Del Grosso [13] applied the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) to identify in time and locate in space the initiation of damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%