2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) - Workshops
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2005.441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Anchor Points for 3D Face Veri.cation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
80
0
3

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
80
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They used elastic matching for curves comparison. Colbry et al [4] Propose to use two different strategies for nose tip detection under frontal and nonfrontal poses. Under a frontal pose, they take the nose tip as the point of the face scan that is closest to the viewer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used elastic matching for curves comparison. Colbry et al [4] Propose to use two different strategies for nose tip detection under frontal and nonfrontal poses. Under a frontal pose, they take the nose tip as the point of the face scan that is closest to the viewer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for a new setting, these methods are not always applicable. Another typical approach in landmark localization is to detect the easiest landmark first, and to use it in constraining the location of the next landmark [9,16,24]. The problem with these methods is that one erroneously located landmark makes the localization of the next landmark more difficult, if not impossible.…”
Section: Automatic Landmarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to use 3D information in conjunction with 2D for landmark localization [16,24,6]. Although the illumination sensitivity of the 2D features will have a detrimental effect on the joint model, one can use features that are relatively robust to changes in illumination.…”
Section: Automatic Landmarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations