2015
DOI: 10.5140/jass.2015.32.2.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of an Impact Flash Candidate on the Moon with an Educational Telescope System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, analogous to several previous studies [10,18,23,36], we used the LunarScan software (developed by Peter Gural) on the recorded videos to perform automated detections of transient events in the field of view. LunarScan determines impact candidates by searching for clusters of pixels that exceed the set threshold above the lunar background; the candidates are displayed for user confirmation upon completion of the analysis [18].…”
Section: Verification For Flash Candidatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, analogous to several previous studies [10,18,23,36], we used the LunarScan software (developed by Peter Gural) on the recorded videos to perform automated detections of transient events in the field of view. LunarScan determines impact candidates by searching for clusters of pixels that exceed the set threshold above the lunar background; the candidates are displayed for user confirmation upon completion of the analysis [18].…”
Section: Verification For Flash Candidatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A minimum separation of 50 km between the sites is recommended by [21], while another study affirms that a distance of 10 km suffices [36]. However, what is important is not the distance between the sites but the parallax from the two sites.…”
Section: Confirmation Of Lunar Activity Naturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations