Abstract:Finding very early biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) to aid in individual prognosis is of major interest to accelerate the development of new therapies. Among the potential biomarkers, neurodegeneration measurements from MRI are considered as good candidates but have so far not been effective at the early stages of the pathology. Our objective is to investigate the efficiency of a new MR-based hippocampal grading score to detect incident dementia in cognitively intact patients. This new score is based on … Show more
“…We previously showed that using only SNIPE scores for hippocampus, plus age and sex, one can reach an overall accuracy of 71% for prediction of progression from MCI to dementia over a 3y follow-up period [11]. In a more recent work looking at a cohort of cognitively healthy older individuals, we showed that our MR-driven SNIPE biomarker was sensitive to AD-related changes in a cognitively normal cohort on average seven years before clinical diagnosis of AD dementia [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Hippocampal and entorhinal SNIPE grading scores were used as the only MRI biomarker features in the predictive classifier. The SNIPE score is described fully in [13,20]. In short, SNIPE assigns a similarity metric to each voxel, which shows how much that voxel's neighbourhood resembles the anatomy of either a group of patients with Alzheimer's dementia or a group of normal controls.…”
Section: Mr Derived Biomarkermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, SNIPE assigns a similarity metric to each voxel, which shows how much that voxel's neighbourhood resembles the anatomy of either a group of patients with Alzheimer's dementia or a group of normal controls. The final SNIPE score is an average of all the voxels in the desired anatomical structure in each hemisphere [12,13]. For this study the SNIPE scores are corrected for age and sex using the method presented in [21] based only on the cognitively normal population to correct for the effect of normal aging and preserve the effect of diseaserelated changes.…”
Background:Predicting cognitive decline and the eventual onset of dementia in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is of high value for patient management and potential cohort enrichment in pharmaceutical trials. We used cognitive scores and MRI biomarkers from a single baseline visit to predict the onset of dementia in an MCI population over a nine-year follow-up period.
Method:All MCI subjects from ADNI1, ADNI2, and ADNI-GO with available baseline cognitive scores and T1w MRI were included in the study (n=756). We built a Naïve Bayes classifier for every year over a 9-year follow-up period and tested each one with Leave one out cross validation.
Results:We reached 87% prediction accuracy at five years follow-up with an AUC>0.85 from two to seven years (peaking at 0.92 at five years). Both cognitive test scores and MR biomarkers were needed to make the prognostic models highly sensitive and specific, especially for longer followups. MRI features are more sensitive, while cognitive features bring specificity to the prediction.
Conclusion:Combining cognitive scores and MR biomarkers yield accurate prediction years before onset of dementia. Such a tool may be helpful in selecting patients that would most benefit from lifestyle changes, and eventually early treatments that would slow cognitive decline and delay the onset of dementia.
“…We previously showed that using only SNIPE scores for hippocampus, plus age and sex, one can reach an overall accuracy of 71% for prediction of progression from MCI to dementia over a 3y follow-up period [11]. In a more recent work looking at a cohort of cognitively healthy older individuals, we showed that our MR-driven SNIPE biomarker was sensitive to AD-related changes in a cognitively normal cohort on average seven years before clinical diagnosis of AD dementia [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Hippocampal and entorhinal SNIPE grading scores were used as the only MRI biomarker features in the predictive classifier. The SNIPE score is described fully in [13,20]. In short, SNIPE assigns a similarity metric to each voxel, which shows how much that voxel's neighbourhood resembles the anatomy of either a group of patients with Alzheimer's dementia or a group of normal controls.…”
Section: Mr Derived Biomarkermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, SNIPE assigns a similarity metric to each voxel, which shows how much that voxel's neighbourhood resembles the anatomy of either a group of patients with Alzheimer's dementia or a group of normal controls. The final SNIPE score is an average of all the voxels in the desired anatomical structure in each hemisphere [12,13]. For this study the SNIPE scores are corrected for age and sex using the method presented in [21] based only on the cognitively normal population to correct for the effect of normal aging and preserve the effect of diseaserelated changes.…”
Background:Predicting cognitive decline and the eventual onset of dementia in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is of high value for patient management and potential cohort enrichment in pharmaceutical trials. We used cognitive scores and MRI biomarkers from a single baseline visit to predict the onset of dementia in an MCI population over a nine-year follow-up period.
Method:All MCI subjects from ADNI1, ADNI2, and ADNI-GO with available baseline cognitive scores and T1w MRI were included in the study (n=756). We built a Naïve Bayes classifier for every year over a 9-year follow-up period and tested each one with Leave one out cross validation.
Results:We reached 87% prediction accuracy at five years follow-up with an AUC>0.85 from two to seven years (peaking at 0.92 at five years). Both cognitive test scores and MR biomarkers were needed to make the prognostic models highly sensitive and specific, especially for longer followups. MRI features are more sensitive, while cognitive features bring specificity to the prediction.
Conclusion:Combining cognitive scores and MR biomarkers yield accurate prediction years before onset of dementia. Such a tool may be helpful in selecting patients that would most benefit from lifestyle changes, and eventually early treatments that would slow cognitive decline and delay the onset of dementia.
“…While this could be an important undertaking in the context of the hippocampal volume segmentation, such analyses are a topic of hot debate in the literature (Coupe et al, 2011a; Coupe et al, 2015; Eskildsen et al, 2013; Davatzikos et al, 2011; Wang et al, 2010). Such a problem would require several design choices, which themselves will be controversial, each of which could easily account for a source of detailed investigation.…”
Hippocampal atrophy rate—measured using automated techniques applied to structural MRI scans—is considered a sensitive marker of disease progression in Alzheimer’s disease, frequently used as an outcome measure in clinical trials. Using publicly accessible data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), we examined one-year hippocampal atrophy rates generated by each of five automated or semi-automated hippocampal segmentation algorithms in patients with Alzheimer’s disease, subjects with mild cognitive impairment, or elderly controls. We examined MRI data from 398 and 62 subjects available at baseline and at one year at MRI field strengths of 1.5T and 3T, respectively. We observed a high rate of hippocampal segmentation failures across all algorithms and diagnostic categories, with only 50.8% of subjects at 1.5T and 58.1% of subjects at 3T passing stringent segmentation quality control. We also found that all algorithms identified several subjects (between 2.94% and 48.68%) across all diagnostic categories showing increases in hippocampal volume over one year. For any given algorithm, hippocampal “growth” could not entirely be explained by excluding patients with flawed hippocampal segmentations, scan-rescan variability, or MRI field strength. Furthermore, different algorithms did not uniformly identify the same subjects as hippocampal “growers”, and showed very poor concordance in estimates of magnitude of hippocampal volume change over time (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.319 at 1.5T and 0.149 at 3T). This precluded a meaningful analysis of whether hippocampal “growth” represents a true biological phenomenon. Taken together, our findings suggest that longitudinal hippocampal volume change should be interpreted with considerable caution as a biomarker.
“…The disease processes leading to AD are known to start while individuals are still cognitively normal and may precede clinical symptoms by years or decades (Jack et al, 2010, Adaszewski et al, 2013). Reflecting this and the call for the biological evidence for AD diagnosis, several AD specific biomarkers have been identified, including multivariate patterns of structural brain atrophy measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Moradi et al, 2015, Bron et al, 2015, Salvatore et al, 2015, Coupé et al, 2015, Eskildsen et al, 2013, Wee et al, 2013). MRI-based biomarkers have the advantages of being non-invasive and widely available.…”
Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) is a powerful neuropsychological tool for testing episodic memory, which is widely used for the cognitive assessment in dementia and pre-dementia conditions. Several studies have shown that an impairment in RAVLT scores reflect well the underlying pathology caused by Alzheimer's disease (AD), thus making RAVLT an effective early marker to detect AD in persons with memory complaints. We investigated the association between RAVLT scores (RAVLT Immediate and RAVLT Percent Forgetting) and the structural brain atrophy caused by AD. The aim was to comprehensively study to what extent the RAVLT scores are predictable based on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data using machine learning approaches as well as to find the most important brain regions for the estimation of RAVLT scores. For this, we built a predictive model to estimate RAVLT scores from gray matter density via elastic net penalized linear regression model. The proposed approach provided highly significant cross-validated correlation between the estimated and observed RAVLT Immediate (R = 0.50) and RAVLT Percent Forgetting (R = 0.43) in a dataset consisting of 806 AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or healthy subjects. In addition, the selected machine learning method provided more accurate estimates of RAVLT scores than the relevance vector regression used earlier for the estimation of RAVLT based on MRI data. The top predictors were medial temporal lobe structures and amygdala for the estimation of RAVLT Immediate and angular gyrus, hippocampus and amygdala for the estimation of RAVLT Percent Forgetting. Further, the conversion of MCI subjects to AD in 3-years could be predicted based on either observed or estimated RAVLT scores with an accuracy comparable to MRI-based biomarkers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.