2003
DOI: 10.1007/bf02931519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of aflatoxigenic fungi in feeds using the PCR method

Abstract: The possibility of using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to speed up and specify the detection of aflatoxigenic fungi isolated from feed was investigated. The method, applied to 2 genes encoding the biosynthesis of aflatoxins (apa-2 and ver-1), was optimized on two collection cultures (Aspergillus flavus CCM F-108 and A. parasiticus CCM F-550). The specificity of the optimized PCR method was proved on collection cultures of different kinds of fungi. Fifty feed samples out of which 18 showed positive findin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three genes were selected for PCR: apa-2, ver-1 and aflR, the regulatory gene of aflatoxin B1 biosynthesis. For PCR involving apa-2 and ver-1 (which were amplified simultaneously), the method according to Shapira et al (1996) was used as modified by Zachová et al (2003). For the regulatory gene aflR, the method according to Sweeney et al (2000) was used.…”
Section: Determining Dna Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three genes were selected for PCR: apa-2, ver-1 and aflR, the regulatory gene of aflatoxin B1 biosynthesis. For PCR involving apa-2 and ver-1 (which were amplified simultaneously), the method according to Shapira et al (1996) was used as modified by Zachová et al (2003). For the regulatory gene aflR, the method according to Sweeney et al (2000) was used.…”
Section: Determining Dna Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most difficult steps in the isolation of Aspergillus DNA is to disrupt the cell wall without causing damage to genomic DNA (Bir et al 1995). Most methods use mechanical or mechanical-physical techniques for the disruption of the cell wall, such as disruption with glass beads (van Burik et al 1998;Haugland et al 2002;Loeffler et al 2002;Kabir et al 2003;Somashekar et al 2004), grinding in liquid nitrogen (Raeder & Broda, 1985;Shapira et al 1996;Färber et al 1997;Sweeney et al 2000;Mayer et al 2003;de Aguirre et al 2004;Manonmani et al 2005), mill grinding (Cenis 1992), alternating freezing and thawing (Griffin et al 2002), ultrasound in combination with lysis buffer containing sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) (Van Burik et al 1998;Zachová et al 2003), and microwave radiation (Tendulkar et al 2003). Enzymes can also be used for digesting the cell wall (Jin et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach is very time-consuming, laborious, and requires facilities and mycological expertise (Edwards et al 2002). PCR-based methods that target DNA are considered a good alternative for rapid diagnosis due to their high specificity and sensitivity, and have been used for the detection of aflatoxigenic strains of A. flavus and A. parasiticus (Shapira et al 1996;Fa¨rber et al 1997;Sweeney et al 2000;Criseo et al 2001;Chen et al 2002;Mayer et al 2003;Zachova´et al 2003;Somashekar et al 2004;Gonza´lez-Salgado et al 2008). However, as yet, none of these methods is capable of reliably detecting and discriminating A. parasiticus alone from other species of Section Flavi by conventional PCR assays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New methods developed in recent years include DNA-based analytical methods (e.g. Polymerase Chain Reaction-PCR) for fungal detection [11], and enzyme-linked immunoassays for mycotoxin detection [12]. Morphologic information during A. flavus growth also can be used for the determination of aflatoxin production [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%