Sludges derived from wastewater treatment are foul-smelling, biologically unstable substances. They contain numerous pathogenic microorganisms, mostly of faecal origin.Wastewater treatment processes are likely to reduce the number of pathogens in the water prior to its return to the environment. The high incidence of pathogenic viruses in sewage sludge is due to the preferential adsorption of viruses to sludge solids. Depending upon the method used to treat domestic sewage, between 50-99.99% of the viruses can be inactivated. Therefore, infectious viruses potentially remain after treatment. With enteric viruses, a low infectious dose can be enough to cause illness (Moe 1991).Studies that compared the persistence of enteric viruses indicated that enteroviruses such as poliovirus (PV) are not reliable indicators of other human enteric viruses of major health significance such as rotavirus (RV), astrovirus, hepatitis A virus (HAV) (Abad et al. 1994) and adenovirus (AdV). For this reason, we selected four enteric viruses (AdV, HAV, PV and RV) for use in a model of virus recovery in sewage sludge.Nucleic acids can be extracted from contaminated environmental samples by many different protocols. These include organic-based extraction by phenol (in the case of DNA viruses) or Trizol ® (in the case of RNA viruses), silica methods and commercial kits. These methods aim to extract and purify nucleic acids by removing cell debris and inhibitors. This extraction step is crucial to environmental virology because the main challenge in molecular detection techniques [such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR)] is inhibition by substances such as humic acids, polysaccharides and other chemicals (Kingsley & Richards 2001). Non-kit-based methods are preferred for routine laboratory procedures all over the world because they are less expensive than kit-based protocols. The reagent Trizol LS is a mono-phasic solution of phenol and guanidine isothiocyanate that is preferred for total RNA isolation from cells and tissues because it has the ability to lyse cells and inactivate nucleases (Boom et al. 1990). When this method is used, total RNA segregates into the aqueous phase, while DNA and proteins remain in the phenol phase and interface. For this reason, the traditional phenol/chloroform protocol is more suitable for DNA isolation. Silica methods are rapid, easy to use and efficient at removing inhibitors (Jiang et al. 2001).In this study, we compared organic-based and silica nucleic acid extraction methods on the basis of their ability to isolate viruses seeded into sewage sludge samples. The efficiency of viral elution was evaluated by PCR, reverse transcription (RT) PCR and RT-nested-PCR. The use of samples contaminated with known amounts of the viruses facilitated direct comparisons between the different extraction methods.
MATERIALS AND METHODSHAV-cytophatic strain HM 175 and human AdV (genogroup C, serotype 5) (AdV5) were propagated in a continuous line of foetal FRHk-4 cells (rhesus kidneyderived cells) and Hep-2 cells (human la...