2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.07.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of a carcinoembryonic antigen using aptamer-modified film bulk acoustic resonators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major difference occurs in the area of functionalizing the FBAR with bioreceptors, for the selective detection of the target analyte from the sample. The bioreceptors used are similar to any of the acoustic biosensors, such as an antibody, aptamers, and nucleic acid probes [178][179][180]. The backside air cavity design enables the bioreceptors to be functionalized on the backside cavity, after coating the cavity area beneath the membrane with an Au sensing layer [181].…”
Section: Fbar As Biosensors: Operating Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major difference occurs in the area of functionalizing the FBAR with bioreceptors, for the selective detection of the target analyte from the sample. The bioreceptors used are similar to any of the acoustic biosensors, such as an antibody, aptamers, and nucleic acid probes [178][179][180]. The backside air cavity design enables the bioreceptors to be functionalized on the backside cavity, after coating the cavity area beneath the membrane with an Au sensing layer [181].…”
Section: Fbar As Biosensors: Operating Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response time of the bioreceptor was also found to be good and comparable or better than some of the reported values by various researchers. [26][27][28][29] In the present study, the equilibrium plateau was attained for each immunoassay run within a minimum time period of 15-30 minutes. The limit of detection for both the biosensors was calculated as blank frequency response by PBS + 3Â noise (standard deviation).…”
Section: Immunoassay Run For Cea Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding ratio for protein G is 10% higher than that of protein A (20.8%), indicating that protein G can immobilize more antibody than protein A and/or provide better antibody orientations. More recently, Zheng et al (Zheng et al 2014;Zheng et al 2016b) have also used AlN-based FBARs to detect the CEA.…”
Section: Fbars As Protein Biosensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(B) fr shifts of FBAR after the adsorption of anti-hPSA antibody (5 mg/L) for 15 min, BSA (50 mg/L) blocking for 15 min and antigen (hPSA, 5 mg/L) binding for 15 min (Zhao et al 2014). (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.)Other than PSA, FBARs have also been fabricated to detect other cancer biomarkers such as epithelial tumour marker (MUC1)Zheng et al 2016a), Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)Lee and Song 2010;Zheng et al 2014;Zheng et al 2016b). An AlN-based FBAR was fabricated with fr approximately 575 MHz as an immunosensor to detect MUC1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%