2018
DOI: 10.1094/pdis-07-17-0935-re
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection, Identification, and Molecular Characterization of the 16SrII-D Phytoplasmas Infecting Vegetable and Field Crops in Oman

Abstract: Typical symptoms of phytoplasma infection were observed on 11 important crops in Oman that included alfalfa, sesame, chickpea, eggplant, tomato, spinach, rocket, carrot, squash, field pea, and faba bean. To identify the phytoplasmas in these crops, samples from infected and asymptomatic plants were collected, followed by amplifying and sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA, secA, tuf, imp, and SAP11 genes. We found that these sequences share >99% similarity with the peanut witches’ broom subgroup (16SrII-D). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The brinjal little leaf disease was first described by Thomas and Krishnaswami (1939) in India with 100% yield loss in epidemics (Rao and Kumar, 2017). Also for this disease, five ribosomal groups were reported: 16SrI (Japan, Bangladesh, and India), 16SrII (Oman and India), 16SrVI (Turkey and India), 16SrIX (Iran) and 16SrXII (Russia and Turkey) (Okuda et al, 1997; Sertkaya et al, 2007; Kelly et al, 2009; Al-Subhi et al, 2011, 2018; Ember et al, 2011; Tohidi et al, 2015; Usta et al, 2015). Similarly phytoplasma infections in chili associated with little leaf, witches’ broom and “brote grande” were reported associated with 16SrVI (India and America) and 16SrII (Egypt) (El-Banna et al, 2007; Randall et al, 2010; Rao et al, 2017a).…”
Section: Phytoplasma Diseases In Vegetable Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The brinjal little leaf disease was first described by Thomas and Krishnaswami (1939) in India with 100% yield loss in epidemics (Rao and Kumar, 2017). Also for this disease, five ribosomal groups were reported: 16SrI (Japan, Bangladesh, and India), 16SrII (Oman and India), 16SrVI (Turkey and India), 16SrIX (Iran) and 16SrXII (Russia and Turkey) (Okuda et al, 1997; Sertkaya et al, 2007; Kelly et al, 2009; Al-Subhi et al, 2011, 2018; Ember et al, 2011; Tohidi et al, 2015; Usta et al, 2015). Similarly phytoplasma infections in chili associated with little leaf, witches’ broom and “brote grande” were reported associated with 16SrVI (India and America) and 16SrII (Egypt) (El-Banna et al, 2007; Randall et al, 2010; Rao et al, 2017a).…”
Section: Phytoplasma Diseases In Vegetable Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the DNA-based classifications using 16S rRNA gene alone may be insufficient for finer differentiation of phytoplasma strains. Detection on primes amplifying nonribosomal regions, i.e., rp , secY , and tuf genes were also used to confirm and validate phytoplasma presence (Schneider et al 1997 ; Lee et al 2004 , 2006 , 2010 ; Martini et al 2004 ; Al-Subhi et al 2018 ). Moreover, universal phytoplasma specific primers for secA gene were also used (Hodgetts et al 2008 ; Bekele et al 2011 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…amplify the 16S rRNA region (Deng and Hiruki 1991;Gundersen and Lee 1996). In addition, distilled water (DW) and DNA from symptomless trees were used as negative control, while alfalfa and lime witches' broom phytoplasmas were used as positive control (Al-Subhi et al 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TUF-II-F1 and TUF-II-R1 were utilized to prime the elongation factor TU targeting 1490 bp, followed by using the seminested PCR primers TUF-II-F2 and TUF-II-R1, which target 1094 bp of the tuf gene. The imp gene was amplified by using IMP-II-F1 and IMP-II-R1 primer pairs (targeting (786 bp) in the direct PCR followed by IMP-II-F1/IMP-II-R1 (targeting 717 bp) in the semi-nested PCR assay (Al-Subhi et al 2018). A partial of translocase protein A gene was amplified in semidirect PCR assays by using SecA-II-F1/SecA-II-R1 in the first reaction followed SecA-II-F1/SecAII-R4 in the second reaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation