Détection d'allo-anticorps antiérythrocytaires en vue de la préparation d'immunoglobulines anti-Rh et de sérums-tests

Garretta, M.; Müller, Anne; Gener, José Luis Murga; Leblanc, Jean-Pierre; David, Marlon; Bay, P.; Puy-Montbrun, M.C. Du; Steinbuch, M; Granier, Christelle

doi:10.1016/s0338-4535(77)80026-3

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The quantity of red cells must be related in order to obtain also an adequate optical transmission ratio, between 18 antibody(ies) specificity(ies) can be con firmed, and the specification of their char acteristics can be made. In 1975, this type of recruitment represented 28% of our glob al production of anti-D plasma for test sera and therapeutic immunoglobulins [9], This profitability does not take into account the other advantages of this automated screen ing: protection of the recipient from cross reaction with donor red cells that might be…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Red Cell Antibody Screening with the Groupamatic System

Garretta¹,

Gener²,

Jerphanion³

et al. 1979

Vox Sanguinis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

These data comprise 1,231,024 routine tests carried out over a 5-year period on voluntary blood donors. The percentage of positive results on the machines varies from 1 to 3% of the total number of samples tested. Antibodies identified either by manual or automated techniques make up 15-20% of the positive screening reactions. Rhesus, Lewis and P systems prevail, whilst Duffy, Kidd and Lutheran systems are absent. This screening has three main advantages: the supply of plasma for our production of test sera, or therapeutic immunoglobulins; protection of the recipient; partial information on the donor’s immunohaematological state, especially for the risk of giving him incompatible blood sometimes in the future.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…At present, we use four Groupamatic 360 ma chines, one of which is devoted to research. We have made over 5 million routine runs, corresponding to about 2 million different samples [9],…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Red Cell Antibody Screening with the Groupamatic System

Garretta¹,

Gener²,

Jerphanion³

et al. 1979

Vox Sanguinis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Détection des alloanticorps antiérythrocytaires sur les équipements Groupamatic par une technique trypsine-polybrène-citrate

Confida

Hurel

Müller

et al. 1978

Revue Francaise de Transfusion et Immuno-hématologie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Red Cell Antibody Screening with the Groupamatic System

et al. 1979

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

These data comprise 1,231,024 routine tests carried out over a 5-year period on voluntary blood donors. The percentage of positive results on the machines varies from 1 to 3% of the total number of samples tested. Antibodies identified either by manual or automated techniques make up 15--20% of the positive screening reactions. Rhesus, Luewis and P systems prevail, whilst Duffy, Kidd and Ltheran systems are absent. This screening has three main advantages: the supply of plasma for our production of test sera, or therapeutic immunoglobulins; protection of the recipient; partial information on the donor's immunohaematological state, especially for the risk of giving him incompatible blood sometimes in the future.

show abstract

Détection d'allo-anticorps antiérythrocytaires en vue de la préparation d'immunoglobulines anti-Rh et de sérums-tests

Cited by 4 publications

References 7 publications

Red Cell Antibody Screening with the Groupamatic System

Red Cell Antibody Screening with the Groupamatic System

Détection des alloanticorps antiérythrocytaires sur les équipements Groupamatic par une technique trypsine-polybrène-citrate

Red Cell Antibody Screening with the Groupamatic System

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About