Proceedings of 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
DOI: 10.1109/iembs.1996.652753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection criteria for evaluation of computer aided diagnosis systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A cluster detection criterion has to be a priori defined. The effect the choice of the detection criteria in addition to the size of the annotated region has on the CAD performance evaluation have been systematically examined in the literature [18,19]. As there is no universal scoring method currently in use for evaluating the performances of a CAD system for microcalcification cluster detection, we briefly describe the detection criteria we adopted:…”
Section: Training and Testing The Cade On The Magic-5 Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A cluster detection criterion has to be a priori defined. The effect the choice of the detection criteria in addition to the size of the annotated region has on the CAD performance evaluation have been systematically examined in the literature [18,19]. As there is no universal scoring method currently in use for evaluating the performances of a CAD system for microcalcification cluster detection, we briefly describe the detection criteria we adopted:…”
Section: Training and Testing The Cade On The Magic-5 Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cluster detection criterion has to be a priori defined. The effect the choice of the detection criteria in addition to the size of the annotated region has on the CAD performance evaluation have been systematically examined in the literature [18,19]. As there is no Table 1: Evaluation of the performances of the standard back-propagation learning algorithm for the neural classifier according to the 5×2 cross validation method.…”
Section: Training and Testing The Cade On The Magic-5 Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…En el caso de [Strickland, 1994], la detección de microcalcificaciones se enfoca al uso de la transformada wavelet en combinación con el criterio propuesto por [Brake & Karssemeijer, 1997], donde se analiza el tamaño, la forma y el número de microcalcificaciones por unidad de área. [Veldkamp & Karssemeijer, 2000] utilizan técnicas clásicas en 1.…”
Section: Segmentaciónunclassified