1990
DOI: 10.1049/ip-i-2.1990.0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and suppression of impulsive noise in speech communication systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen, the noise produced by such a system occurs in bursts, where its value is precisely zero for at least some of the time. A typical audio signal degraded with impulse noise can have an average impulse width of around 1 ms while the fraction of the signal that is contaminated is usually less than 20 percent [15]. If α is the fraction of signal samples contaminated by impulse noise the average signal to impulse noise ratio is given by [16] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen, the noise produced by such a system occurs in bursts, where its value is precisely zero for at least some of the time. A typical audio signal degraded with impulse noise can have an average impulse width of around 1 ms while the fraction of the signal that is contaminated is usually less than 20 percent [15]. If α is the fraction of signal samples contaminated by impulse noise the average signal to impulse noise ratio is given by [16] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the signal trend on the left and on the right of the missing sequence boundaries our task is to fill the gap. Using time domain based approaches known in literature it is not possible to solve the problem if the gap is more then one hundred of samples [2], [3], [5]. Better results can be obtained using frequency domain based approaches [6].…”
Section: Subband Signal Recoveringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have a sequence with inside a gap of missing data that must be filled. Two different approaches are used: the first is based on a linear prediction algorithm [2][3], while the second is based on a non-linear prediction algorithm, realized using neural networks [5]. In this case a new neuron model is used characterized by an adaptive spline activation function [9].…”
Section: Subband Signal Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations