2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and spatial prediction of rockfalls by means of terrestrial laser scanner monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
146
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
146
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For ALS this comes from the fact that GPS has Abellan et al 2010) become available for public application during the mid-1990s. The TLS device market developed later because of the lack of software for 3D data processing and problems for handling huge amount of data (point clouds with several millions of points).…”
Section: Discussion and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For ALS this comes from the fact that GPS has Abellan et al 2010) become available for public application during the mid-1990s. The TLS device market developed later because of the lack of software for 3D data processing and problems for handling huge amount of data (point clouds with several millions of points).…”
Section: Discussion and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A great improvement in the rockfall hazard assessment is the monitoring of fallen blocks from a cliff between two epochs or more (Rosser et al 2005;Lim et al 2006;Lato et al 2009;Abellan et al 2010;Pedrazzini et al 2010). Indeed, such approaches allow for the quantification of the magnitude and activity of rockfalls in a cliff.…”
Section: Tlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Near-continuous TLS has the potential to generate a considerable number of point clouds (> 10 3 -10 4 ), representing a 2 to 3 order of magnitude increase in data volume over previous terrestrial lidar monitoring campaigns with lower temporal resolution (e.g. Teza et al, 2007;Abellán et al, 2010;Rosser et al, 2013;Royán et al, 2015). Key attributes of the techniques developed to process such datasets therefore relate to computational efficiency, the ability to automate processing, and minimising the accumulation of error between each survey pair.…”
Section: Processing Techniques For Near-continuous Surface Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%