Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and size differentiation of simulated tooth root defects using flat-panel volume computerized tomography (fpVCT)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study (20), 62.5% of small cavities (0.16-mm wide and 0.15-mm deep) and 87.5% of large cavities (0.3 mm) were diagnosed with a 0.125-mm voxel size. Only 1 study (8) had similar sized cavities to ours. Cavities were correctly identified in 77% of cases, and the absence of cavity was correctly identified in 53%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another study (20), 62.5% of small cavities (0.16-mm wide and 0.15-mm deep) and 87.5% of large cavities (0.3 mm) were diagnosed with a 0.125-mm voxel size. Only 1 study (8) had similar sized cavities to ours. Cavities were correctly identified in 77% of cases, and the absence of cavity was correctly identified in 53%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The cost and exposure dose are lower than multislice computed tomography (3)(4)(5). The literature has already shown that CBCT is a good radiographic method for diagnosing ERR (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small resorption defects were accurately diagnosed in 69% of cases. These values were 96% for medium size and 89% for severe, large defects (22). In 2012, Neves et al evaluated external root resorption using different voxel sizes of CBCT and showed that by an increase in size of defects, the accuracy, sensitivity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of diagnoses increased as well (23, 24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Numerous studies 17,[38][39][40] substantiate the good diagnostic capabilities of fpVCT for small bone structures. Obenauer et al 41 demonstrated that with the prototype of a fpVCT the imaging of different phantoms can be distinctively improved in comparison to the results afforded by MSCT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%