2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and risk factors of Coxiella burnetii infection in dairy cattle based on bulk tank milk samples in center of Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with the reported prevalence in other countries, confirming that C. burnetii shedding through milk is widespread in dairy cattle herds in different countries. Reports from other countries like the USA, the Netherlands, Spain, Hungary, Portugal, Iran, and Poland revealed a wide range of prevalence, reporting shedding of C. burnetii through cattle milk of between 18.8% and 94.3% [9,[28][29][30][31][32][33]. The reported C. burnetii prevalence of 33.7% in Greek dairy cattle is around the mid-range of the other countries, but still can be considered as high, since almost one out of three farms host active C. burnetii shedders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is consistent with the reported prevalence in other countries, confirming that C. burnetii shedding through milk is widespread in dairy cattle herds in different countries. Reports from other countries like the USA, the Netherlands, Spain, Hungary, Portugal, Iran, and Poland revealed a wide range of prevalence, reporting shedding of C. burnetii through cattle milk of between 18.8% and 94.3% [9,[28][29][30][31][32][33]. The reported C. burnetii prevalence of 33.7% in Greek dairy cattle is around the mid-range of the other countries, but still can be considered as high, since almost one out of three farms host active C. burnetii shedders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the risk factors for exposure of cattle to C. burnetii, significant associations have been primarily linked with management practices (Carbonero et al 2015, Nokhodian et al 2016, Boroduske et al 2017. In South Africa, the practice of communal kraaling at night may have contributed to the exposure of cattle to C. burnetii through milk, aerosol, and vectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because C. burnetii is an agent that can infect a wide range of hosts, from unicellular beings (such as amoeba) to invertebrates, reptiles, birds and mammals (CUTLER et al, 2007;NASPHV, 2013;ELDIN et al, 2017), the dispersion of this pathogen in extensive areas seems to be easily achieved. In this sense, the data presented in this study were relevant, both from an economic point of view and for public health, considering that cattle are one of the main reservoirs for human infection (GEORGIEV et al, 2013;NOKHODIAN et al, 2016). An outbreak of Q fever has been recently described among cadets in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil, whose diagnosis was confirmed by serologic tests (LEMOS et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Although serological evidence of exposure to C. burnetii has already been reported in cattle in Europe (CZAPLICKI et al, 2009;AGGER et al, 2010;BOTTCHER et al, 2011;GACHE et al, 2017;RYAN et al, 2018;VARELA-CASTRO et al, 2018;VIDAL et al, 2017;SOFTIC et al, 2018), Asia (CETINKAYA et al, 2000NOKHODIAN et al, 2016), North America (MCQUISTON et al, 2005 and Africa (KAMGA-WALADJO et al, 2010;SCOLAMACCHIA et al, 2010), there are few data on seroprevalence to this agent in ruminants in Brazil. In this regard, while GuimarĂŁes et al (2017) found a seropositivity rate of 2% for C. burnetii among sheep sampled in the state of PiauĂ­, northeast of Brazil, Oliveira et al (2018) found a seroprevalence of 55.1% in a herd of goats with history of reproductive disorders in the state of Alagoas, Northeast of Brazil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%