2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00111.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and quantitation of ABO RBC chimerism by a modified coil planet centrifuge method

Abstract: A modified coil planet centrifuge method is established by which ABO chimerism could quantitatively be analyzed and ABO variants identified to the same degree of accuracy as the other differential methods and flow cytometry. The monitoring of ABO chimerism might also help the diagnosis of early relapse or rejection after ABO incompatible HPCT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FC also detected 99.5 percent of clinically relevant alloantibodies, while CAT and LISS‐IAT identified 98.9 percent and 94.7 percent, respectively. To overcome the necessity of dispersing RBC agglutinates before FC, we optimized a vacuum filtration method that eliminated the need for vigorous vortexing and pipetting or caustic agents like glutaraldehyde 4,16,17,22 . Using the filter plate FC technique, 104 of 109 samples (95.4%) were correctly typed for ABO and D, whereas the remaining five samples were read as NTD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FC also detected 99.5 percent of clinically relevant alloantibodies, while CAT and LISS‐IAT identified 98.9 percent and 94.7 percent, respectively. To overcome the necessity of dispersing RBC agglutinates before FC, we optimized a vacuum filtration method that eliminated the need for vigorous vortexing and pipetting or caustic agents like glutaraldehyde 4,16,17,22 . Using the filter plate FC technique, 104 of 109 samples (95.4%) were correctly typed for ABO and D, whereas the remaining five samples were read as NTD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, these comparisons were made using authentic clinical samples with abnormalities including weak alloantibodies, rouleaux, autoantibodies, and mixed‐field reactions, which are not uncommon in hospitalized patients. In contrast, other recently described methods have only used samples from healthy donors, and none of these methods has been applied to routine alloantibody identification 19–22 . We have not yet examined assay performance for pretransfusion cross‐matches, but we anticipate that accuracy will be similar to that seen for ABO serum testing (“immediate spin” cross‐match) and RBC alloantibody testing (“Coombs” cross‐match).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use nonagglutinating (IgG) antibodies Chemically convert agglutinating IgM pentamers into nonagglutinating IgM monomers, e.g., using dithiothreitol [48,57] or 2-mercaptoethanol Purify IgG fractions of sera on Protein G [49] Dilute antisera past point of agglutination Avoid use of potentiators Chemically fix the RBCs prior to incubation with anti-A, -B, -M, or -N, e.g., with dimethylsuberimidate [74], formaldehyde [47,75], or glutaraldehyde [13,21,44,49] To avoid agglutination caused by secondary antibody:…”
Section: Selection Of Direct or Indirect Labeling Methods For Each Blomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To detect allogeneic transfusions, currently available methods are based on the antigenic differences between the recipient's RBCs and the donor's RBCs. Originally, serological techniques were performed, such as detection of ''mixed field'' reactions when performing antigen typing and differential agglutination where percentages of agglutinated and unagglutinated RBCs were determined manually or by automated methods [9][10][11][12][13]. More sensitive quantitative techniques to characterize transfused RBCs are the enzyme-linked antiglobulin test [14] and flow cytofluorometry [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Detection Of Allogeneic Transfusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation