2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-010-9474-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and Localization of Myocardial Infarction using K-nearest Neighbor Classifier

Abstract: This paper presents automatic detection and localization of myocardial infarction (MI) using K-nearest neighbor (KNN) classifier. Time domain features of each beat in the ECG signal such as T wave amplitude, Q wave and ST level deviation, which are indicative of MI, are extracted from 12 leads ECG. Detection of MI aims to classify normal subjects without myocardial infarction and subjects suffering from Myocardial Infarction. For further investigation, Localization of MI is done to specify the region of infarc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The KNN and the SVM are supervised learning models which are used for identifying the class levels of the test feature vectors. These classifiers are used for cardiac arrhythmia detection [9], [28]. The SVM is a two class classifier.…”
Section: B Classifiers and Performance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The KNN and the SVM are supervised learning models which are used for identifying the class levels of the test feature vectors. These classifiers are used for cardiac arrhythmia detection [9], [28]. The SVM is a two class classifier.…”
Section: B Classifiers and Performance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include time-domain method [7], [8], [9], ST-segment analysis [10] [11], wavelet transform based method [12], [13], and neural network approach [14], [15], [16]. Some of them are based on modeling techniques by training and testing the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note though that they considered four different classes for their localization experiment while we consider only two. Arif et al [2] again reported a very high accuracy for MI localization, but as stated previously their results are tainted by problematic formation of training and testing sets. Again, we note that the PM performs well in MI localization as compared with other methods.…”
Section: Detection Of MImentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Lahiri et al [19] reported a high 96% detection rate on this data set. Arif et al [2] reported a very high detection rate of 98% but their choice of training and testing data was problematic. That is, they considered classification of heart beats rather than subjects and thus heart beat data from the same subject were included in Downloaded by [Michigan State University] at 17:41 07 February 2015 both the training and testing sets, which provided skewed results.…”
Section: Detection Of MImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their accuracy was 82.5% with specificity of 79.82% and sensitivity 85.71%. Muhammad Arif et al [11] used K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) classifier and got an accuracy of 98.3%, sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 99.6%. In [12], Akshay Dhawan et al used Multilayer Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Genetic Algorithm (GA) to detect MI.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%