2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and infectivity potential of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) environmental contamination in isolation units and quarantine facilities

Abstract: Objectives: Environmental surfaces have been suggested as likely contributors in the transmission of COVID-19. This study assessed the infectivity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) contaminating surfaces and objects in two hospital isolation units and a quarantine hotel. Methods: SARS-CoV-2 virus stability and infectivity on non-porous surfaces was tested under controlled laboratory conditions. Surface and air sampling were conducted at two COVID-19 isolation units and in a quaran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
93
2
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
93
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesize that the door handle sampled in our study was contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 by an asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic individual who initially acquired the infection in Seattle (or, possibly, in China) and then traveled to the University. In keeping with the observation that viability/transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 on surfaces may be limited [ 20 , 21 ], we did not see evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 strain identified was the basis for subsequent emergence and spread of COVID-19 in our region. Instead, our data are consistent with multiple local introductions of SARS-CoV-2 from different countries/regions, as reflected in the divergence of sequences seen among our UF strains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We hypothesize that the door handle sampled in our study was contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 by an asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic individual who initially acquired the infection in Seattle (or, possibly, in China) and then traveled to the University. In keeping with the observation that viability/transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 on surfaces may be limited [ 20 , 21 ], we did not see evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 strain identified was the basis for subsequent emergence and spread of COVID-19 in our region. Instead, our data are consistent with multiple local introductions of SARS-CoV-2 from different countries/regions, as reflected in the divergence of sequences seen among our UF strains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, when SARS-CoV-2 was placed on a surface in a solution containing bovine serum albumin (BSA) at a concentration of 10 g/l, intended to mimic the concentration of protein found in respiratory secretions, the decline was much slower, with a half-life of >96 hours [ 18 ]. In hospital-based studies, reported rates of surface contamination within COVID-19 patient rooms (based on detection by PCR) vary widely: in one study, SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was detected on 29 (51%) of 55 surface samples, although investigators were not able to culture the virus from any of these samples [ 20 ]. In a second study, only 3 of 22 surface samples tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This probably explains otherwise surprising results such as the lack of viral RNA detected in an oncology ward housing patients with COVID-19 (24), or the very low probability of detection in an ICU (25). Several studies detected SARS-CoV-2 RNA in these environments but were unable to culture infectious SARS-CoV-2 virions (26)(27)(28).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Samples were collected on styrene filter cassettes followed by a two-step RT-PCR protocol using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). Other studies demonstrated viable SARS-CoV-2 in single hospital rooms of infected patients 11,12 and in isolation units 13 collected by bioaerosol samplers. Moreover, Nissen et al 14 were able to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in central ventilation systems distant from patient indicating that airborne SARS-CoV-2 can be transported over long distances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…10 Samples were collected on styrene filter cassettes followed by a two-step RT-PCR protocol using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). Other studies demonstrated viable SARS-CoV-2 in single hospital rooms of infected patients 11,12 and in isolation units 13 collected by . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license It is made available under a is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%